Account Menu

IP Address: 195.154.151.123

, , , , ,

45 Responses to Episode 700 – Dr. Troy Lawrence

  1. shane March 8, 2017 at 12:03 am #

    Billy Nye says we all started out as goo that became You by way of the Zoo. That is by definition ” Madness “?

  2. randers8 March 7, 2017 at 6:18 pm #

    Where is Bomar?

    • michael March 9, 2017 at 2:33 am #

      Yeah, where is old footstoolio?

  3. Thomas Cool March 7, 2017 at 10:23 am #

    I don’t agree with Dr. Lawrence hardly at all. He doesn’t believe that trillions upon trillions of molecules could form an amino acid in billions of years. Yet, he will believes that a God that he has never seen created life magically and instantly. He is free to believe that but there is no way that he can prove what he says. His statements are based on nothing more than the belief in pure magic. All religions say that they are to the only true religion. They are not all correct.
    I look at all religions as pieces of a big picture. I see different planes or dimensions as different channels on a TV. We are aware of the Physical World but soul or consciousness is a spark of God. I also exists on other different levels or channels. Time does not exist to soul. It is all the same time, the present. The higher in frequency or plane number you go, the slower time seems. The fifth plane is the plane where soul exists without body and exists only in the present. I have been there and the peace, tranquility, love and serenity is many many times more greater than what people experience here on Earth. The reason for this is that billions of souls there are all radiating those high frequencies.

    • Rodrookey March 8, 2017 at 7:37 am #

      Hi Tom. Have you read or seem anything by David Wilcox regarding the Source field?

  4. Terry March 7, 2017 at 8:02 am #

    Brother Nathaniel has some thoughts on how President Trump can deal with the deep state and drain the swamp! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qhej29hBLww

  5. Thomas Cool March 6, 2017 at 11:02 pm #

    John, You were talking about Austin’s South by Southwest concert. I was just in Austin. In my hotel, I was the only White person there for 4 days. Whites in Austin are wimpy liberals. There is not hardly an Alpha Male in the whole town. The Mexicans just walk in and the latte sipping Whites welcome them with open arms. Isn’t diversity wonderful? Austin is an example of what happens when there are no Alpha Male A-holes in a society. Trump is an alpha-male. There is a case to be made for alpha males. Tom Cool

  6. HG March 6, 2017 at 9:59 pm #

    Such a fa-nominal show John B. and make no mistake, YOU are a huge part of our lives. By the way where did you get that great shirt???
    God Bless.
    HG

  7. Theresa March 6, 2017 at 12:26 pm #

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/syrias-water-cut-off-by-turkey-following-mccain-erdogan-meeting/5578092
    It happened just as Dr Troy was alluding to….interesting!

  8. Theresa March 6, 2017 at 11:41 am #

    John, the information is great but there are times the way you say things just makes me laugh. Not easy to do considering the subject matter….[I am three quarters of an hour in to the 2nd part] I so enjoy your shows and I thank you!

  9. Jimbeau March 6, 2017 at 3:37 am #

    Ahh… the question that was not (for me) asked of this very interesting gentleman. I have learned a lot in this interview. Dr. Lawrence broke down, into scientific or mechanical terms, many things that help alter my perception of our history and how we cannot trust things like carbon dating to be fact. It was very informational to hear things such as that the appendix is still a useful organ; not vestigial.
    If Mr. Wells can remember, I would love to have him ask guests, like the doctor, what the possible explanation is for the state of the fibula in humans. I have never heard any reasonable answer to why this seemingly useless bone (which, to me, screams vestigial) is NOT a sign of us evolving. It looks very much like the remnant of an ulna (or radius); of a time when our legs operated like our forearms, in terms of being able to swivel. I have no problem melding evolution with our being created, unlike many or most people, it seems. I don’t see why they have to be exclusive of each other.

    • Jacob March 6, 2017 at 11:07 pm #

      Our legs operate similar to our forearms. Foot rotates and whatnot to position properly on uneven terrain… I guess you think it’d be better to have pogo legs? Vestigial comment.

    • John March 7, 2017 at 5:34 am #

      Agree, everything in your body has a purpose, natural doesn’t give things you don’t need. It just doesn’t work that way.

    • z71offroad2000 March 7, 2017 at 7:37 am #

      John and Crew,

      Best episode to date! Thank you.

    • Jimbeau March 9, 2017 at 12:33 am #

      Jacob: There is no movement between the tibia and the fibula. Our lower leg does not rotate like our forearm does. Vestigial is correct though. The fibula USED to have a purpose… evolution.
      John: Then what IS the purpose of the fibula?

  10. Ken March 5, 2017 at 4:52 pm #

    Congratulations on show number 700. This talk with Troy Lawrence was a fascinating explanation of how the planet’s history may be much shorter than what we were taught in school. I’ve never heard some of these explanations before, i.e. oxygen levels, speed of rotation, gravity change and the effect on life. Great show.

  11. Sigrid March 5, 2017 at 2:48 pm #

    Good show. It is a spirit run world. I recall you used to say…keep looking up. Good place to look.

  12. sharonoliveria March 5, 2017 at 12:04 am #

    John, Staff & Family of CTM, I didn’t know where to address this, I am very sorry to report the death of one of our Brother’s in Christ , David Cris Putnam, he passed away unexpected March 1st 2017, I am so shocked to hear of His passing, I just heard, He was very loved, many know Him through His book’s & joining with Steve Quale & Tim Alberno & Tom Horn on their special show’s , and was the guest on many, many show’s.

    Again, He is now has a Golden Crown upon His Head, & is with the Lord Jesus, our thought’s & prayer’s go out to His loved one’s Family & so many friends & fan’s of His work , Cris passed away unexpected , He was just 51 years old He will be very missed ! John & Miss B No one knows when the last day will be here on Earth but we know where we are going to spend the rest of our days -Eternity spend with Jesus & loved ones in Heaven, I am very, very sadden , Cris gave a lot to the Kingdom of God in His work, He will really be missed. Blessing in Jesus Sharon

  13. Robbie March 4, 2017 at 11:15 pm #

    John B., you wondered if the powers that think they are would destroy the earth. I believe the Bible says they will try. They tried to destroy the lineage of humankind, they tried to destroy the keepers of G-d’s word, the Jewish people. They tried to destroy the Redeemer and now the only path is the earth itself. Check out Rev. 11:18.

  14. Preston March 4, 2017 at 1:56 pm #

    I enjoyed the hooking up science and Jesus. A1 presentation thanks downloading for review nothing else matters more than the love in the heart.

  15. Beverly March 4, 2017 at 10:47 am #

    John B

    Had the most interesting thought about a scripture concerning Heaven. There is a very mathematical/geometrical description of Heaven, I don’t think it is wisdom to spell it out but will only give one word which those who have explored the stories of the vimana might consider.

    Thanks Bev

  16. Nolan March 4, 2017 at 9:53 am #

    Thank you Dr. Troy for sharing your knowledge and science about creation and the flood. This subject is so fascinating. I spent the next hour on Google Earth scrolling around Israel to look at the Dead sea, Turkey, etc. I love that we can many times actually see evidence and clues when we really start looking from a proper perspective of truth.

    The first introduction I had into creation science was a book called “The Collapse of Evolution” by Scott M. Huse. It has some excellent information. I’ve never fully read it all the way through because some of the scientific detail is a bit overwhelming to me, but I do use it as a reference guide when I can for certain topics that I’m reading at the time. I also started watching videos put out by Creation Ministries International (Creation.com). They’ve got some really great discussions and info on the topics. It’s been a while since I’ve really read up on the creation subjects though, and your interview sparked my interest in it again.

    Dr. Troy, you have a gift for really hitting the hammer on the head. I had never even heard of the air density and higher oxygen view. Every time I read about the canopy of water it has never made sense to me. It sounds so alien without understanding that it’s scientifically possible. Although I’ve always believed that man walked with dinosaurs and the flood destroyed the old world, the depressurization and expansion of the universe completely makes sense! There was a dramatic, dramatic event for it to shape so much that changed. What are your thoughts on Pangaea being broken up at this time? Or that the ice age allowed natural bridges between bodies of land over which the natives migrated to North America when the languages were confused? Interesting stuff to think about.

    Logic says that when you start with a false premise, your findings will be false. This is contemporary science today. It starts with a false premise that there is no God, nor can there be. It doesn’t “allow a divine foot in the door” as people say. Because of this, they have to force their premise to have a God-voided view. It’s not at all impartial or neutral when you really start to look at the tools and methods that are used – all of it starts with the atheistic assumption. To have scientists that actually use investigation and observation, but starting from a premise of TRUTH of the Word, it’s the only time I get excited about science because I know the logical conclusions are based on a sound premise. It’s truly valuable to have people like Dr. Troy that share their gift with others.

    Just curious, on this same subject of what we can observe today based on Biblical accounts, what are everyone’s thoughts on Ron Wyatt and the Noah’s Ark in Turkey? Or the “Real Mt. Sinai” being Jebel Al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia? I tend to agree with both of these discoveries, but it’s interesting to see what other people think.

    -Nolan

  17. Mark March 4, 2017 at 8:42 am #

    John I love the show and I consider it a radio program because I never really watch the video and play the full mp3 instead lol but anyway show 700 was very interesting Dr Lawrence makes some very good points about an oxygen enriched environment I am glad that I am a loyal subscrber

  18. ROLAND EDGAR March 4, 2017 at 5:34 am #

    Dear Caravaners: Readers will be aware of my campaign against.. THE EU..THE FOURTH REICH….FASCISTS INCORPORATED.

    The two “soft power” weapons of the 4th Reich are the HRVP Federica Mogherini and Commissioner Johannes Hahn.

    On the other side..our side.. that is THE CHRISTIAN SIDE..we have MARIA ZAKHAROVA.

    We only need one in this class because she is worth about 5 on the other side (The Dark Side). This woman has a very wide global following.

    Maria is a very good looking woman. This helps in her job, but underneath this woman is tough and determined and can handle any situation.

    Here is some of her work:

    Question: Can you comment on US media reports regarding contacts between US Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Russian Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak during the US election campaign?

    Maria Zakharova: As a character in a famous work of fiction said, “It’s something shameful.” The current goings-on in the Western, including US, media can be described as media vandalism. I wonder if the Western media has reached the rock bottom or it still has further to fall. As I browsed the internet today, I saw an item by CNN according to which “Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador, is considered by US intelligence to be one of Russia’s top spies and spy-recruiters in Washington.” There are dozens of articles about Russian diplomats who are supposed to be spies or spy-recruiters or hold secret meetings. This background is being used to plant rumours about the allegedly secret meetings between Russian embassy staff and Americans in Washington. I’ll tell you a military secret: the job of a diplomat includes holding meetings in the receiving state. This is a written truth. If diplomats don’t maintain contacts and don’t attend negotiations, they are not diplomats. If they are diplomats, and Ambassador Kislyak and other embassy staff hold Russian diplomatic passports, it is their duty to meet with officials and members of the political establishment of the receiving state.

    What US and other media write is an attempt at total disinformation of their own and the global public, but the main target is the American public. First we called this an information campaign. And then we changed the tone and described it as hysterics. But it is even worse than that, it’s George Orwell’s “1984.” We see now what he meant when he wrote about Big Brother. The Big Brother in the United States today is the US media, which have moved far beyond the limits of professional ethics and competence and feel free to denounce and condemn, or simply to fabricate news. This is exactly what is happening now. This is terrible, because the heat of internal political competition has reached the media, including the US media, which have joined the hostilities and are destroying the prestige and trust in media publications not only of their own public but also the international community as a whole. It is a frightening trend. The attempts to raise the public’s temperature by writing about the Russian diplomats’ allegedly secret contacts are part of a blatant disinformation campaign. Everyone knows how diplomats work and that meetings and contacts are part of their job. Will you write about the number of contacts and the contacting parties of the US Embassy staff in Moscow? Not interested? Just ask them about this. Or maybe you want to know the number of people employed at the US Embassy’s press service in Moscow? No? Why not? It is very interesting information that can shed light on great many questions.

    There is a big divide between a politically motivated involvement in the election process and the current goings-on, which are designed to undermine the global public’s trust in and for the media. In our opinion, this is the only credible explanation.

    The current trend is to write about the demise of Russian diplomats in a disgraceful and inhumane manner. All of us wanted to believe that Russian Ambassador to India Alexander Kadakin, Russia’s Permanent Representative to the UN Vitaly Churkin and Russian Ambassador to Turkey Andrey Karlov would live forever. But they are mere humans, and two of them died and one was killed. Russian Ambassador to Turkey Andrey Karlov was treacherously killed in a terrorist attack, yet many US media outlets, though not all of them, did not describe his murder as a terrorist attack and, what is even worse, justified his murderer.

    As for Russia’s Permanent Representative to the UN Vitaly Churkin, I did not expect the US media to stoop to mud-throwing and provocations. Even my colleagues at the Russian Foreign Ministry sometimes ask me if this abracadabra and the conspiracy theories planted in the global information space are true.

    I want to stress that the question is much broader and much more frightening. Journalists used to write their articles to win prestige for themselves and their media outlets, because their work is focused on winning public trust. What is happening now is a global disaster, because people are losing trust in the media. What will happen next? I believe they do not fully understand that they are opening Pandora’s box, considering that terrorist organisations also have access to this information technology, and that hundreds of thousands of people, as they lost trust in the media, will turn their attention to the internet, where really fake news and unreliable information are waiting for them. This is a terrible process.

    By the way, this is also true about Montenegro and the recent information about it, with endless allegations about Russian diplomats who worked or did not work somewhere, and names that match or don’t match. To be honest, I want to say that we will deal with this only after we receive official documents from the Montenegrin authorities. And everything else is fake news and information planted for specific purposes. Taken together, this constitutes a trend. You may remember the information campaigns about the Sochi Olympics, Aleppo and doping in Russia. By the way, the latter allegation has been overturned. The latest information campaign is targeting Russian diplomats. The outcome will be deplorable: the global public will lose any trust in the media. Unfortunately, it will be our new reality.

    • ROLAND EDGAR March 5, 2017 at 1:59 pm #

      Article 28 of the Treaty of 8 April 1965 establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities (the merger treaty) lays down that the European Communities shall enjoy in the territories of the Member States such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the performance of their tasks, under the conditions laid down in the protocol annexed to that treaty.

      Articles 9 and 10 says…

      Article 9

      Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or

      legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance

      of their duties.

      ‘Article 10

      During the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy:

      (a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;

      (b) in the territory of any other Member State, immunity from any measure of

      detention and from legal proceedings.

      (c) Immunity shall likewise apply to Members while they are travelling to and from the place of meeting of the European Parliament.

      (d) Immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members.’

      “UK POLITICIANS ARE IMMUNE FROM QUESTIONING OR PROSECTION”

      So the only time a politician isn’t immune is when they are caught in the act of committing an offense. So if the Cook Report Tapes ever show up then perhaps Ken Clarke could be prosecuted for sexually assaulting me as he would have been filmed in the act of committing a crime. Unfortunately, the lawyers protecting these politicians have placed a time limit on even making a complaint, so Ken Clarke could escape questioning on those grounds if the tapes were found and made public. Effectively, the UK parliament and European Union have given members of parliments a license to get away with murder, literally. In general, this form of immunity is such that, unless the British Parliament or the EU gives its authorization, no member may be arrested or prosecuted for acts not carried out in the performance of their duties.

      Of course unless politicians are filmed and recorded twenty four seven then there is no hope of bringing any prosecutions against any politicians within the European Union super state, which is why politicians get caught for minor offenses like parking offenses, speeding offenses or hate crimes. There have been the occasions whereby investigative journalists in recent months have filmed politicians and caught them in yet more “Cash for Questions” scandals but we can’t rely on mainstream media journalists all the time.

      So why are Politicians Immune from Prosecution? Well to find out lets look back into the history of the parliamentary system.

      In ancient Rome, the tribunes of the people enjoyed special protection in order that they should freely exercise their functions. Anyone who infringed that prohibition was liable to punishment and could even be executed.

      Today’s right to immunity is based on the same basic idea, although, fortunatly for me, it does not incur the same penalty! The representatives of the people must enjoy certain guarantees to underline the importance of their office, but more importantly to give them the peace of mind they need to implement their mandate.

      The origins of parliamentary immunity date back to a session of the English Parliament in 1397, when the House of Commons passed a bill denouncing the scandalous financial behavior of King Richard II of England. Thomas Haxey, the member who was behind this direct act against the King and his court, was put on trial and sentenced to death for treason. Following pressure applied by the Commons, however, the sentence was not carried out, and Haxey received a royal pardon.

      This event prompted the House of Commons to review the right of members of parliament to discuss and debate in complete autonomy and freedom, without interference from the Crown. Freedom of speech, introduced into the House of Commons at the beginning of the sixteenth century was confirmed in the 1689 Bill of Rights, which expressly protected discussions and acts of Members of Parliament from any form of interference or objection from outside of Parliament.

      ALL POLITICIANS HAVE IMMUNITY, EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE RETIRED!

      Unlike inviolability, non-liability has an absolute quality, reflected in particular in the duration of its effects: the protection afforded is maintained even after the member’s mandate has come to an end. In other words all politicians have immunity even when they are no longer politicians and have retired. However, whilst there may well have been very good reasons to safe guard parliament from the interference of the crown. Its clear that these privillages are being abused along with the nations children.

      When it comes to Paedophilia, child abuse and sexually motivated crimes should politicians still have the right to immunity?
      After all how is abusing children part of their Parliamentary mandate? I have never voted for any politician to abuse children. It’s clear that after the Jimmy Savile case it appears that he had immunity from prosecution along with other powerful Paedophiles and child abusing celebrities. The Daily Star Sunday tells of police being told “Stop investigating if you want to keep your jobs” when investigating an alleged paedophile ring at the heart of Margaret Thatcher’s government. A teenage rent boy had alleged that a cabinet minister at the time, who is still alive, had abused him. He also named judges and civil servants. We now know that they were then and will always be, immune from any form of prosecution or questioning by the authorities.

      I was informed by the Metropolitan Police that there were protocols in place that meant politicians are above the law and cannot be questioned. I guess they were referring to these EU rules which now govern us all.

      Shouldn’t the public be informed of these EU rules? Where is the report on the BBC and other mainstream news outlets informing the public of the EU’s rules. Perhaps the BBC executives and board members are also immune from prosecution like all the other Paedophiles in the country it seems. Perhaps it’s time to change the EU and UK rules on paedophiles operating in and around Westminister. However, if you think that it’s just the Politicians who are immune from prosecution then think again. These privillages also apply to civil servants, their assistants, witnesses, experts and anyone who is involved in the meetings including private individuals in business .

      Isn’t it time for politicians to stop being immune against prosecution in regards to child abuse or will we allow these paedophile politicians to continue to abuse parliamentary rules and our children? Not being immune from prosecution may not stop paedophilies but it will mean that “we the people” can have them arrested and prosecuted when witnesses are brave enough to come forward.

      If you are interested in stopping corruption then join me on my “WALK OF CORRUPTION 2013” starting from the Hoe in Plymouth at 10am in the South West of England on Sunday 23rd June 2013 walking the 300 miles to London. Join me for a mile or day and make your voice heard. This may well be our only opportunity to show the government that we will no longer tolerate corruption of any sort. The time is now!

  19. ROLAND EDGAR March 4, 2017 at 4:52 am #

    HaHa BINGO

    • ROLAND EDGAR March 4, 2017 at 4:56 am #

      For the last three hours I was convinced I had hit THE JACKPOT and got myself banned off the C to M board. By the way the C to M email system is infiltrated, has to be. Either that or they hired a raw intern.

    • Brendi March 4, 2017 at 9:09 am #

      Hi Roland, please can you send more info to me? brendi@caravantomidnight.com

    • ROLAND EDGAR March 7, 2017 at 12:11 am #

      Request to all Caravan Members:

      Please email your politicians and tell them what you know and what you think is happening. We cannot expect them to be clairvoyant.

      Not all the emails I send are negative, and when a good policy is made then let them know. When the policy is not working then let them know how and why. An example:

      Ma’am (HRVP Federica Mogherini)

      https://sputniknews.com/military/201703061051322642-canada-extend-ukraine-training-mission/

      Canada along with the Netherlands has been active in the persuit of supporting the KIEV junta since July 2014 if not before.

      I started to take an active interest on July 17 2014 as GAZA was being insanely destroyed, and the MH17 commercial airliner was shot down.

      There are people who take pleasure in the geopolitical “games” and the ethos and methods used today relate directly back to the end of WW2.

      In those days many people were able to practice and perfect and inflict violent assaults on others. Those people after the war continued as they had when they had the martial mandate. Evil people who take pleasure in hurting others.

      This process has been ongoing for at least 400 years and has become part of the folklore. The technology of today means the events can be accelerated.

      There are factions who are not prepared to wait, and take much pleasure in causing death and destruction.

      The EU displays all of the characteristics necessary to enact another world war. This is inevitable given the foundation that was laid post WW2.

      You have made a difference for the better and for that I thank you. We all worry about the situation and hope that sanity will prevail. Thank you for taking my emails.

      Faithfully Roland Edgar Dent GBR DL13 3PR

    • ROLAND EDGAR March 7, 2017 at 1:09 am #

      WARNING ROGUE SPURIOUS EMAIL USING the C to M suffix.

      This email address kk@caravantomidnight.com

      IS ROGUE Do not open.

  20. Glennis March 4, 2017 at 2:57 am #

    Where will I find the article on the Germany underground sites that John read on Fridays show?
    Thanks, Glennis

    • ROLAND EDGAR March 7, 2017 at 12:20 am #

      Just a note here:

      “She signs by her full name, Dipl.-Ing (adequate German expression for Msc or Meng., for Master of engineering”

      The Dipl.Ing qualification is equivalent to the UK B.Sc Eng ( discipline). It is the first degree standard in Europe, all

      other quals follow that.

  21. ROLAND EDGAR March 4, 2017 at 12:45 am #

    THE GERMAN ISLAM LINK

    “The Teutonic “superman” instinctively sensed that the Turkish Caliphate would be his natural ally. By the turn of the century, the destinies of both countries were inextricably linked. In 1898, Kaiser Wilhelm II vowed Germany’s eternal friendship for the Muslim world as he stood with Turkish leaders before the tomb of Saladin the Great in Damascus.”

    “This trust and understanding between Islam and Germany, is part of the reason Yugoslavia was broken up in cahoots with radical Islam, shortly after Germany gained reunification itself. Destroying the final remnants of post-war treaties and geographical borders.”

    For more also read:

    https://adarapress.com/2016/04/12/adolf-hitler-greatest-man-in-history-tweets-muslim-labour-counciler-in-uk-aysegul-gurbuz-20/

    https://adarapress.com/2015/12/05/like-clockwork-der-spiegel-published-the-timeline-in-2005-frightening-and-absurd-a-lunatic-plan-conceived-by-fanatics-and-now-for-the-sixth-phase/

    https://adarapress.com/2014/12/08/us-state-department-helped-shield-haj-amin-al-husseini-from-prosecution-for-war-crimes/

    https://adarapress.com/2014/11/22/nazi-money-and-post-war-terrorism/

    Germany – Protector Of Radical Islam

    With the current turmoil in the middle-east, and Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood clinging desperately to their new-found power in Egypt, a little history is in order to fully grasp the full picture of what is happening, and why Germany is involving itself with Islam.

    The history of modern German colonialism begins with the advent of Bismarck. Although at first preoccupied with the problems of the newly unified German states, he ultimately hastened to satisfy his imperialistic appetite by extending German power abroad. But the Prussian Chancellor’s decision to encourage the Reich’s penetration of Africa came very late, and Bismarck had to content himself with the residue of the other powers.

    The nineteenth century was an age of empire builders, with the scientific and economic might of England and France everywhere expanding. Britain had already occupied Egypt, colonized much of Africa, while France was firmly entrenched in Algeria and Tunisia. Now, with a cautious respect for London, Bismarck attempted to fish in the remaining colonial waters of the African Continent.

    With British consent, he managed to establish, in April, 1884, the first German protectorate on the southwestern coast of Africa. Eventually, German East Africa (Tangan-yika), Togoland, and the Cameroons were added to the glory of the Berlin Colonial Office. In 1905, the Reich was eliminated from the arena of colonization by Britain and France, when the latter recognized the establishment of a British protectorate over Egypt, in return for British acknowledgment of a French protectorate over Morocco.

    Germany violently protested against this arrangement, and the Kaiser hurriedly departed for Tangier in March of 1905, where he asserted his nation’s support for the independence of Morocco. Thus, by championing the cause of a Muslim people, Germany began to forge the chains between herself and the world of Islam. Germany finally acquiesced to French aspirations in Morocco in exchange for a small portion of Equatorial Africa.

    The Moroccan dispute, however, signaled the end to any further German acquisitions on the African continent. Subsequently, the Reich could only step aside and jealously watch the spoils of empire enhance the economic wealth and political prestige of her Western competitors.

    After only thirty years of colonization from 1884 to 1914, the Germans’ imprint and influence in the sections of Africa which they had administered, is still remembered. Although they have been officially gone from these regions for many years, the older natives still recalled right up through the 20th century, the brief period of tutelage under their former rulers, and did not conceal their respect for the harsh, authoritarian character of the Germans.

    The growing scientific and military might of the Reich, however, required still more room for expansion—far beyond the restricted national frontiers of central Europe and her comparatively insignificant African colonies. She was astir with aggressive economic power and productivity which needed new markets.

    But the door to further penetration in Africa had been closed by Britain and France. And so the Kaiser inevitably cast his eyes toward the fertile crescent and the Middle East as potential spheres of influence—areas rich in markets, oil, and raw materials.

    In order to fulfil this aspiration, the imagination of the German political leaders was fired with the idea of constructing a railroad to the East – Berlin to Baghdad. The central point between the heart of Germany and the remote interior of Mesopotamia was Constantinople, the capital of the Ottoman Empire. At a time when the apathetic ruler of the Turks was making a belated, almost desperate effort to reform, the Germans were irresistibly drawn to this imperial seat of Muslim empire.

    The Teutonic “superman” instinctively sensed that the Turkish Caliphate would be his natural ally.

    By the turn of the century, the destinies of both countries were inextricably linked. In 1898, Kaiser Wilhelm II vowed Germany’s eternal friendship for the Muslim world as he stood with Turkish leaders before the tomb of Saladin the Great in Damascus.

    During the years leading to the First World War, Berlin assumed more and more this role of “Protector of the Arabs” and “Savior of Islam,” a role which she has never relinquished. Even after the outbreak of war, with the encouragement of his German ally, the Ottoman Sultan-Caliph Muhammad Rashed invoked his subjects to rise in a jihad against the Western infidels.

    When the conflict brought unprecedented disaster to both nations in 1918 and the same judgment was passed upon both peoples, it was the German, more than the Turk, who remained true to his ideal. Although the Reich’s ambitions had been thwarted through her defeat and her African colonies had been lost, it did not at all destroy her ingrained militaristic nationalism or diminish her future lust for expansion.

    Meanwhile, at the supreme moment when Kaiser Germany and Muslim Turkey lay prostrate in defeat awaiting their punishment, Britain, France, and Russia proceeded to carve up for themselves the remnants of the vast Ottoman Empire with its rich Arab hinterland, according to the terms of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement negotiated between them as early as 1915 while the Great War was still in progress. As soon as this proposed plan for dividing up the Arab world was publicized, any trust which the lands of Islam may have placed in the Allied powers was forever dispelled.

    True, England especially had encouraged the Arabs to revolt against Turkish rule, yet it was unthinkable that a new sovereignty should be imposed on them by a European power.

    In vain did the delegation of Egyptian nationalist leaders strive to voice their grievances at the Versailles Conference of 1919, demanding that their cause be heard and that justice be rendered to Egyptian national aspirations for independence, in accordance with President Wilson’s Fourteen Point Program. They were rebuffed, along with all the other Muslim leaders who had arrived in Paris to plead their respective cases. A British protectorate over the land of the Pharaohs was included in the peace treaty, and the Egyptians were informed, in no uncertain terms, that the matter was officially closed.

    The repercussions throughout Egypt and Islam were instantaneous, with much help from German agitation. This was regarded, in the eyes of every Muslim, as a most sinister act of betrayal. The significance of this stab-in-the-back by the victorious European powers was clearly enunciated in a formal warning of vengeance by the Egyptian leaders in Paris in the Egyptian White Book of 1919. It is a grim reminder that Islam never forgets:

    “We have knocked at door after door, but have received no answer. In spite of the definitive pledges given by the statesmen at the head of the nations which won the war, to the effect that their victory would mean the triumph of right over might and the establishment of the principle of self-determination for small nations, the British protectorate over Egypt was written into the Treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain without the people of Egypt being consulted as to their political status. This crime against our nation, a breach of good faith on the part of the powers who have declared that they are forming in the same Treaty a Society of Nations, will not be consummated without a solemn warning that the people of Egypt consider the decision taken at Paris null and void. If our voice is not heard, it will be only because the blood already shed has not been enough to overthrow the old world-order and give birth to a new one.”

    As sporadic and sanguinary uprisings rocked the Middle East, a fanatical hatred for Christian imperialism burned within the breast of every Muslim.

    Without realizing it at the time, the Occidental powers had prepared a fertile breeding ground for the new Communist propaganda which lost no time in fanning the flames of anti-Western feeling, not only in the Middle East but throughout the restless, awakening Orient. If the Versailles Treaty had spelled calamity for Egypt and the Arab world, its effect upon Germany was quite different.

    The far-flung territories of the Turkish Empire had been reshuffled and refashioned to form new states and spheres of influence, but a defeated Germany had been left more or less geographically intact. As later events were to prove, the so-called harshness of this treaty was shrewdly exaggerated by German statesmen and politicians during the Weimar era of 1919-1932, in order to speedily resurrect their nation by appealing to the sympathy of the Western powers.

    The Allied occupation of Germany was of short duration, and German reparations were reduced to a meaningless figure when weighed against the generous and un-repaid loans she received from both Britain and the United States. Only fourteen years elapsed before Hitler arrived upon the scene, prepared for another onslaught against the world.

    In spite of the practical results effected by the Treaty, Versailles became the living symbol of perfidy to Germany, Egypt, and all Islam, welding them together for posterity in an indissoluble bond of trust and lasting friendship. Germany continued to be the “Savior of Islam.”

    Through the generosity of her former enemies, she rapidly rose from the ashes of defeat, again to assert her role as a great power. Between the two world wars, the old drive eastward was renewed, and German agents, technicians, and businessmen were soon re-established in the Middle East. Once more, the Germans had been irrevocably drawn to Islam. The outbreak of hostilities in 1939 found Germany militarily prepared to resume her historic drive to the East.

    The mission of finally uniting the cradle of Islam with the glory of the Third Reich fell to Rommel’s “Afrika Korps.” In 1942, during the early stages of the desert campaign, the situation of the Allies was pregnant with impending disaster. From within, it soon became obvious that Egypt and the Arab Middle East were secretly plotting to betray the democracies and welcome the Germans. In every country they controlled, the British swiftly rounded up all the pro-Axis political trouble-makers and exiled them, including Haj Amin al-Husseini, the ex-Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, and Rachid Ali Gailani, who had organized the unsuccessful Iraqi coup d’etat in 1941.

    The exiles fled to Turkey and finally took refuge in Berlin, where they worked hand in hand with the Germans for the remainder of the war.

    In Egypt, events took a similar course. The Egyptian Premier, Aly Maher Pasha, who had been entrusted with British defense plans for the country, was quick to deliver them to an Italian intelligence officer.

    Confronted with the alarming prospect of an Egyptian betrayal, as they had been in 1914 when they were forced to depose the pro-Turkish Khedive Abbas Hilmi and declare Egypt a protectorate of the empire, the British, as if time had stood still for twenty-eight years, repeated the identical operation.

    Surrounding Abdine Palace with troops and tanks, they compelled King Farouk to replace the pro-German Aly Maher with Mustapha Nahas, the leader of the Wafd. At least, the possibility of Egyptian interference had now been lessened, and the British could devote their full attention to Rommel’s advancing “Afrika Korps.” This desperate British maneuver to save Egypt and the Suez Canal from German conquest was regarded by the young Egyptian Army officers as an unforgivable act of treachery. The blow to their national pride served to inspire the underground formation of Nasser’s “Free Officers’ Movement,” and to strengthen their determination not only to avenge this humiliating action, but to further sabotage Britain’s already precarious position.

    As the on-rushing tide of German armoured columns lapped at the gates of Alexandria, the young group of Egyptian officers conceived their daring plan. Rommel was already at El Alamein, poised for the thrust which would deliver Egypt to the Germans and pave the way to hoisting the swastika over Suez and the Middle East. Their wild scheme, interestingly enough, was to be executed by Wing Commander Hassan Ibrahim, and Lieutenant Colonel Anwar al-Sadat, two of the most important members of Nasser’s military junta who later ruled Egypt.

    The third participant was General Aziz al-Masri, who later became the regime’s first ambassador to Moscow. The mission was a daring one, and its purpose was to furnish the Germans with secret information on British strategy and troop movements. Hassan Ibrahim provided his personal plane, and Anwar al-Sadat, together with General al-Masri, were to fly over the German lines and establish contact with them. But British Military Intelligence were on the alert. General al-Masri never got very far, and Anwar al-Sadat was intercepted as he attempted to carry out his part of the plan.

    This experience, however, has never been forgotten. Ten years later, on July 24, 1952, the day after the Revolution, Wing Commander Ibrahim, writing in the influential Cairo daily, Al-Ahram, recounted the story of this audacious undertaking:

    “In 1942, the Germans were at Alamein. We decided to send them an officer to offer them our assistance in the form of information on the British forces. … I was then the Commandant of the Director of Civil Aviation of Cairo, which allowed me to give my private plane to our emissary. We decided that our communications with the Germans would take the form of secret missions effected by a transmission officer, Anwar al-Sadat.

    Rommel’s objective had been the Suez Canal and the oil-rich Middle East. At the Battle of El Alamein, scarcely seventy miles from Alexandria, General Montgomery had obliterated that aspiration, as everyone believed, forever. For the second time in twenty-five years, Britain had prevented Germany from reaching the strategic waterway and the Middle East.

    But had El Alamein actually been the decisive blow to the constant, almost mystical German longing for union with the lands of Islam?

    As if the eighteen years had never been, by 1960 the invincible German Drang nach Osten, in the full vigor of its post-war renaissance, once again flourished in the Valley of the Nile and the lands of the fertile crescent. Perhaps the almost forgotten rows of orderly white crosses in the British and Commonwealth Cemetery at El Alamein, surrounded by the scorched and swirling sands of the Western desert, are but a mirage.

    Could that glorious battle have been a pyrrhic victory, a temporary armistice, while Germany patiently waited to undermine Britain’s declining influence and power?

    For by 1960, the ghost of the “Afrika Korps,” renewed and resolute, had at last attained its objective. Following the course of the Nile at a point in the geographical center of Egypt, where the city of Assiut is situated, there originates a range of uneven, reddish brown hills which winds its way southward toward the Valley of the Kings and ultimately to the cataracts of the Nile. Known as the Emerald Hills, these barren recesses still conceal many mysteries of the early Egyptian dynasties, but they also hid one of the most cleverly guarded secrets of the 1950s Cairo government.

    Here, dwelling in isolation, were a large number of adventurous Germans, well known for their wartime exploits in Egypt, whose pursuits are neither historical nor archeological. They were an amalgam of ex-Wehrmacht officers, including generals and colonels, majors and captains, and ex-Gestapo Storm Troopers. Most of them were former Rommel veterans busy clandestinely training thousands of Egyptian recruits for future combat.

    Long before the Battle of El Alamein in 1942, the desert had been the traditional landscape of the Islamic world.

    By 1960, among the endless sand dunes flanking the Nile Valley, the Egyptian Army trained for its special missions, endeavoring to master the tactics of desert warfare from the experienced brains of Rommel’s renowned “Afrika Korps.” The living remnant of his wartime staff and panzer divisions had been painstakingly gathered in order to transform the Egyptian Army into a crack, superior fighting force. Eighteen eventful years had passed, and the memory of Rommel’s exploits still haunted the silent battlefields of the Western desert and the minds of Cairo’s military leaders.

    The defeat of the “Afrika Korps” in 1942 had once again shattered the Pan-Germanic, Pan-Islamic dream, and left the Egyptian Army in a state of despair. Their own hopes of “liberation” had been temporarily dispelled, but the feats of Rommel in the North African campaign emerged in the postwar era as the most romantic of legends. In the Valley of the Nile, the study of Rommel as a brilliant tactician, and the implementation of his ideas on desert warfare, remained the basis of U.A.R. Army https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_Republic curriculum.

    This pro-German cult in Egypt, reaching to the point of hero-worship, increased steadily through the years and erupted in full tide when the military dictatorship seized power in July, 1952. Before his imprisonment in 1954, General Naguib himself had enunciated the official attitude of the regime toward the Germans:

    “They are the only ones in whom we have confidence.” During the course of an interview, he had further elaborated: “I want you to believe me when I say that I have not changed the great admiration I have for the Germans. Their efficiency, their extraordinary gifts as scientists and technicians, and their loyalty are quite unique. I have been noticing all these qualities in recent times, watching the work of the German officers and experts in my Army.”

    At the time of the Revolution, the new government’s Minister of Hygiene, Dr. Noureddine Tarraf, openly declared:

    “Hitler is the man of my life. The German dictator had been an ideal leader, who dedicated his life to the realization of his noble ambition. He never lived for himself, but for Germany and the German people. I have always wished to live like him.”

    Dr. Tarraf may never have had the opportunity of living like the Nazi demagogue, but the new generation in Egypt of the 1950s certainly did, since former leaders of the Hitler Youth Movement were training Egyptian youth organizations. Lieutenant-Colonel Anwar al-Sadat, intimate collaborator and personal friend of Nasser, held identical views, and his admiration for Hitler had not at all changed since his wartime “exploit” at El Alamein.

    In November of 1953, in reply to a questionnaire issued by Al-Mussawar, a prominent Egyptian weekly, regarding his appraisal of Hitler’s activities eight years after the latter’s death, and what advice he would offer the Fuhrer should he return, Colonel al-Sadat asserted:

    “Dear Hitler, I welcome you back with all my heart. You have been defeated, but in fact one should regard you as the real victor. There will be no peace in the world until Germany againtakes first place. Your principal mistake was in opening too many fronts, but everything has been forgiven, for you are a shining example of belief in one’s fatherland and people. You are eternal, and we shall not be surprised if we see you again, or a second Hitler, back in Germany.”

    While the new government ministers were singing the praises of Hitler, whom the fascist-Arabs refer to as “Abu Ali,” Otto Remer, who had saved the Fuhrer’s life in the Generals’ plot of 1944, and aspired to succeed him, fled to Egypt from West Germany to evade prosecution after his neo-Nazi party was banned.

    “The creation of a strong Arab army,” wrote Remer in the Nazi publication Der Weg in June, 1953, “is of immediate and direct concern to Germany’s patriotic forces which are prepared to offer the services of its best men.”

    Yet Remer was only one minor element of the central organization in Egypt which inexorably linked the German and Egyptian nations. The very nucleus of German activity in Cairo revolved round a notorious, globe-trotting, former SS Colonel, who was busy extending the network of mounting German influence and penetration throughout the Nile Valley, Africa, and the Middle East.

    Colonel Nasser’s chief military and geopolitical advisor, intimate foreign collaborator, and confidant, was none other than the full-blooded Nazi, SS Colonel Otto Skorzeny, who was dispatched to Cairo in 1953 upon the advice of his father-in-law, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s former financial wizard, now president of a Dusseldorf bank specializing in the promotion of German-Arab trade.

    Skorzeny’s reputation as a military expert, daring commando, political master-mind, and leading figure of the Fascist International, spread across four continents. He was one of the key conspirators in an international clandestine organization of exiled Nazis whose chief objective was to keep alive the ideology of National Socialism and to work from abroad for the strengthening and resurrection of a united Germany in its new bid for world power.

    This sinister network of neo-Nazi intrigue operated from the heart of the German colony in Madrid, and its activities and contacts extended to Dublin, Rome, Bonn, Berlin, Communist East Germany, the Soviet bloc, Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, as well as North and South America.

    On May 28, 1959, Skorzeny, en route to Ireland, was refused permission to land in England by British immigration authorities at London airport. He continued on to Dublin, which by then had replaced Madrid as his principal base of operations, and purchased a large farm outside the Irish capital. From there, he was in constant contact with Bonn and Cairo.

    Skorzeny first achieved prominence as the liberator of Mussolini through the most audacious exploits. His achievements thereafter reached such fantastic heights that he became a legendary figure. By 1960 Skorzeny, with the unlimited support and encouragement of the Egyptian military regime, worked inconspicuously under the facade of a respectable import-export firm in Cairo. But his products were of a very special kind. He did not trouble himself with the ordinary trifles of Parisian perfumes or full-fashioned nylon stockings.

    For the exclusive use of the U.A.R. Army, he imported any brand of unemployed ex-Wehrmacht soldiers, offering them infinite scope for their professional skills.

    Qualifications for these positions were simple but unique: a strong faith in the Nazi ideology; a passionate prejudice against anything American, British, French, or Israeli; and an unequivocal acceptance of Gamal Abdel Nasser as the new Egyptian Fuhrer and aspiring Fuhrer of the entire Muslim world. Military prowess, of course, was a primary requirement.

    Another of his major activities was the arms traffic, and his contacts and agents were world-wide, even extending behind the Iron Curtain. One of his outstanding maneouvers admirably displayed his unsurpassed talent for international intrigue.

    Always available to stir up trouble for the West, Skorzeny personally arranged with General Franco for the sale of $3,500,000 worth of military equipment including shells, mortars, and machine guns to Egypt. This secret transaction was effected through an intermediary company in Switzerland, and the arms were particularly adaptable for hit-and-run attacks.

    Yet this was only part of the work of his global network to insure the continuous shipment of armaments to Egypt and the Arab countries.

    Through Skorzeny’s international web of intrigue, former German U-boat officers were hired to help staff and train crews for the new submarines which Nasser received from the Soviet Union.

    From the main European headquarters of the Muslim Brotherhood in Frankfurt-am-Main and its branch in Bremen, special recruitment centers had been organized in Hamburg, Munich, and Hanover to guarantee a steady flow of military technicians to the United Arab Republic.

    In Leipzig, East Germany, a special employment unit for the same purpose was established with the full knowledge of Moscow.

    Through these semi-official channels passed such infamous personalities as SS General Dirlewanger, the liquidator of Poland’s Jewish population, universally known as the “Butcher of Warsaw,” who became Nasser’s special advisor on guerrilla warfare.

    Accompanying him to the Middle East as military advisor to the Egyptian Army went SS Colonel Adolph Eichmann, who was the intimate collaborator of the Grand Mufti during World War II and the Nazi fanatic responsible for the extermination of all Jews in the areas of German occupation. From the Arab countries, Eichmann eventually moved on to Argentina via Spain.

    In Egypt, Skorzeny’s primary responsibility was the equipping, organizing, and training of thousands of zealous commandos, who were rigorously prepared in the Emerald Hills for guerrilla and desert warfare to serve as an “Army of Liberation” against Israel. At regular intervals, bands of F.L.N https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Liberation_Front_(Algeria) terrorists were also trained for operations against the French in Algeria.

    Working in key positions with the Algerian Rebel Government in Cairo were four fanatical exiled Nazis who assumed Arab names. SS Sturmfuhrer Baumann, known as Ali ben Khader, who was Einsatzkommando in the unit which tortured women and children in the Warsaw Ghetto; Willi Berner, then Ben Kashir, a former SA Fuhrer and a guard in the Mauthausen Concentration Camp; Karl Luder, then Abdel Kader, a former Hitler youth leader in Danzig and a commando who served in a number of concentration camps; and Dr. Erich Alten, then Ali Bella, who played a major role in the assassination of Professor Theodor Lessing at Carlsbad in 1934, and who was Gestapo “Commissar for Jews” in Galicia during the war.

    As a double insurance against another defeat by the Israeli Army, the Nasser regime formed an Arab Foreign Legion to fight against the Jewish state. Its nucleus consisted of 400 former Nazis and Gestapo veterans, who were recruited by Arab League agents in Germany.

    Adami’s career was by no means been a dull one, or lacking in adventure. In the days of the Weimar Republic, he was a member of the extreme right-wing organization called the “Scharnhorst Free Corps,” which participated in the Kapp Putsch of 1920. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapp_Putsch

    During the last war, he was a Gestapo Storm Trooper and served in Poland with the Dirlewanger Extermination Brigade. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger He was active in Otto Remer’s outlawed Reichspartei, and for a time earned his livelihood by selling pornographic photographs and anti-Semitic publications.

    In 1957, he was hired by Arab agents to sign up volunteers for the Arab Legion from the many SS veterans’ organizations. For every recruit he sent on to Cairo, he was paid commissions ranging from $500 to $750.

    Colonel Nasser himself was the supreme authority over all Commando units and the Arab Foreign Legion while Skorzeny was responsible for the human consignments of German military experts, armament technicians, and espionage agents in quest of adventure, self-expression, and a greater Germany.

    Those applicants selected for special assignments as agents were merely required to have enough knowledge of political intrigue to sense the growing importance of Egypt in Germany’s master plan and new bid for world leadership.

    For export, Skorzeny offered an unusual assortment of psychological warfare, subversive propaganda, political conspiracy, up-to-date information on arranging the perfect coup d’etat, and a natural genius for cynical Real-politik.

    Skorzeny took an active though clandestine role in most of the controversial political events in the Middle East. Every alert Middle East media correspondent of the era, knew that it was he who engineered the operation in 1955 which brought Shukri el-Kuwatly back to Damascus from Cairo and installed him as president of Syria.

    Thus the way was prepared for the Syrian-Egyptian anschluss, creating the United Arab Republic in February, 1958. The Syrian armed forces of the U.A.R. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_Republic were reorganized and advised by a military mission headed by ex-Wehrmacht Colonels Rainer Kriebel and Heinz Heigel.

    The elite of Germany’s military skill had all been imported through Skorzeny’s “underground railroad” and with the unofficial approval of the Bonn Government. The original military advisory group in the country had been headed by former SS Lieutenant General Wilhelm Farmbacher and his assistant, Panzer Major General Oskar Munzel. Major Mertins was the specialist who had organized the Egyptian Parachute Corps.

    By 1960 Nasser’s State Security Cadre (SSC), formed along the lines of Hitler’s Schutz Staffen (SS), was an internal Gestapo-like force of 70,000 men, whose officers were mostly Arabized Nazis with headquarters in Cairo’s Liberation Square.

    They were under the direction of Lieutenant Colonel Al-Nasher, whose real identity was Leopold Gleim, chief of Hitler’s personal guard and Gestapo Security Chief of German-occupied Poland, who was sentenced to death for war atrocities.

    Also within the Cairo administrative hierarchy was an Advisor on Special Activities, Joachim Daemling, former Chief of the Gestapo in Dusseldorf. He was responsible for the efficient organization of the Egyptian Secret Police and especially for the establishment of concentration camps at El-Kanater and Abu-Sabal, near Cairo; at Maharik in Upper Egypt; at Qena, in the vicinity of the Ptolemaic Temple of Denderah; at El-Kharga, deep in the Western desert; and at Samara, about 135 miles southwest of Alexandria, which had been patterned on photocopies of the infamous German extermination camp of Dachau.

    The entire camp network was under the medical supervision of two special Nazi experts: Dr. Hans Eisele, chief physician at Buchenwald concentration camp; and SS Hauptstabsarzt Heinrich Willermann, known as Lieutenant Colonel Naim Fahum, former medical director at Dachau.

    The Egyptian Security Police, in charge of the nation’s prisons, was headed by Colonel Ben Salem, alias SS Fiihrer Bernhardt Bender. Chief of the Intelligence Service of the Wehrmacht Security Division in the Ukraine during the war, Bender organized all Egyptian prisons along Gestapo lines.

    Colonel Hassan Suleiman, who in reality was the Sudeten German SS Gruppenfuhrer Moser, together with his assistant, SS Gruppenfuhrer Buble, known as Lieutenant Colonel Amman, ws in charge of training Egyptian youth along the lines of the Hitler Jugend.

    Behind the abrupt dismissal of British General Glubb Pasha by the Jordanian monarch on March 1, 1956, were the SS specialists in Cairo. The startling facts surrounding this event are known by American and British Intelligence, but remain a well-kept secret.

    At first, neither Britain nor America saw any cause for alarm over the activities of these “German specialists.” Nevertheless, on May 11, 1953, Sir Winston Churchill brought up the subject in the House of Commons and stated that the Egyptian Army “was being aided and trained by Nazi instructors and staff officers in unusual numbers.”

    He subsequently discussed the matter with German Chancellor Adenauer, who disclaimed any responsibility and merely promised to institute an investigation.

    Only the French, with their Cartesian sense of realism, thought that the presence of so many Germans in the Nile Valley was an ominous sign and could not be taken lightly nor easily explained. Devoid of illusion, they rightly concluded that the Germans were in Egypt for the express purpose of re-establishing their power and influence in the Middle East at the expense of the United States, Britain, and France.

    As the 1960s got under way, Germany and Egypt continued to abound with renewed industrial activity. In many ways, Egypt resembled a German military outpost, as more and more technicians, salesmen, experts, material, and unlimited capital poured into the Valley of the Nile.

    The economic and technical expert of German specialists, Dr. Wilhelm Voss, former Nazi director of the Skoda arms factory in Czechoslovakia and the Hermann Goering Steel Mills, was the real architect of the U.A.R. economy.

    Plans were advanced for the construction of armament factories in Egypt and the Sudan as joint enterprises of the Nasser regime and the Ruhr industrial giant, Alfred Krupp, with the full encouragement of the Bonn Government.

    Skorzeny’s political and economic web of intrigue thus carried Egypt to the heart of the Ruhr Valley and deposited her on the threshold of Germany’s war-making potential.

    Together with Dr. Voss, Skorzeny channeled a great deal of the profitable Egyptian trade through the Dusseldorf firm of H. S. Lucht, an import-export house owned and directed by Werner Naumann, former Secretary of State in the dreaded Gestapo Ministry of Heinrich Himmler.

    Most of the financial dealings of Naumann’s firm passed through Dr. Schacht’s bank in Dusseldorf, whose Nazi economic theories, carried on by Dr. Voss and imposed by Nasser, were adopted as the foundation for the U.A.R “state economy.”

    In 1953, when neo-Nazi activities in Germany were already well advanced and had become too conspicuous, Naumann and seven of his collaborators were arrested by the British occupation authorities for plotting, at home and abroad, with Skorzeny’s world-wide network to overthrow the Bonn government and establish a dictatorship.

    Among the seven arrested conspirators was Dr. Gustav Scheel, former leader of the Nazi Students’ League, and also the close friend of the Grand Mufti.

    Dr. Scheel had introduced Haj Amin al-Husseini to Hitler, and later smuggled him out of occupied Germany into Switzerland. The Naumann scandal greatly irritated Dr. Adenauer’s government, which tried to minimize the significance of the sensational expose. They had the effrontery to accuse the British of meddling in Germany’s internal affairs!

    The evidence of British Intelligence was so conclusive (several shipping containers full) however, that Thomas Dehler, then Bonn Minister of Justice, belatedly announced, four months after the arrests: “The Naumann Circle represented one of the greatest dangers to Germany. Its aim was to seize power after the forthcoming election, which was supposed to be the last consultation of a free people.”

    It was also the shrewd hand of Dr. Voss behind the scenes, which drew up the detailed plans stressing the advantages to be gained by Egypt in obtaining Communist arms. vOn October 26, 1955, the well-informed German news magazine, Der Spiegel, reported that Voss “initiated the big armament deal with the Czech agents—Prantel, Nohinec, and Rostrum—who operated behind the facade of refugees, but who in reality were Communist agents.”

    Regardless of time, circumstance, and changing methods, the extreme right and left continue to work together. One is somehow reminded of Hitler’s classic remark to Hermann Rauschning:

    “There is no essential difference between the ideals of National Socialism and those of Marxism.”

    In Cairo, Skorzeny’s mission was to firmly ally Egypt and the Muslim world with Germany, and decisively destroy American, British, and French influence in the Middle East and Africa. In short, he and his global underground organization were the unofficial eyes and ears of Bonn’s foreign office, and the chief architects of its double-faced diplomacy.

    Both Skorzeny and Dr. Voss maintained constant and intimate contact with Chancellor Adenauer’s personal advisors, Professor Walter Hallstein, then president of the West European Common Market, and Dr. Herbert Blankenhorn, Bonn’s ambassador to Paris.

    All Cairo buzzed with gossip for weeks in 1954 when Dr. Gunther Pawelke, the official West German ambassador in Egypt, angrily resigned, protesting that more confidence and encouragement were accorded to Voss and Skorzeny by the Adenauer Government than to their own official representatives.

    Skorzeny’s ultimate aim was to create, in conjunction with Nasser, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Arab League, a German-Egyptian dominated third-power bloc and empire stretching from Berlin to Capetown, and from Bonn to New Delhi.

    The time was not yet ripe, however, to unmask themselves and operate in the open.

    Nasser and the Grand Mufti threw wide open the influential doors of the Egyptian-dominated Arab League to their German ally. Into the secret cornerstone of the League’s policy was lodged a program calling for the fullest cooperation and preference for German commerce and aspirations in the Middle East.

    The Mufti’s admiration for Germany was boundless, and he defined the Germans as “a people with boldness, perseverance, toughness, and a love of order.”

    According to him, “Every Muslim throughout the world is a friend of the Germans.”

    In the fields of political and psychological warfare, vicious anti-Western and anti-Israeli propaganda was unremittingly carried on by the Nasser regime under the direction of Johann von Leers, one of the former high-ranking Nazi propagandists in the Berlin Foreign Ministry. Von Leers, who was considered a specialist on racial questions, was also the author of a great number of anti-Semitic publications. Later converting to Islam, he assumed the Arabized name of Oman Amin von Leers.

    In the May 29, 1953 issue of the neo-Nazi journal, Deutschland-Brief, von Leers violently attacks the Protestant Confessional Church for its opposition to Hitler, and praises the natural affinities between the German and Arab peoples. Advancing the theory that this factor enabled Islam to carry on a successful campaign of conversion in Germany, he predicts that the Germans will eventually turn their backs on Christianity and embrace Islam.

    “This,” he writes, “is no doubt due to the moving humanitarian reception which hundreds, perhaps thousands of German refugees, found after the war among the Muslims of the Middle East. Islam’s simple all-God doctrine which is not tied to Judaism, and its enmity against the Jews, won the allegiance of many of these refugees. The repercussions are gradually being felt in Germany.”

    Von Leers’ special activities on behalf of the Egyptian military regime were carefully camouflaged until he was discovered and unmasked in 1956 by William Stevenson of the Toronto Star and Ann Sharpley of the London Evening Standard. This sudden, embarrassing exposure prompted Nasser to act quickly, and both correspondents were hastily expelled from the country.

    Von Leers’ job was to draft and coordinate all foreign propaganda for the Cairo government. Through his office, the contract for the construction of the largest and most powerful radio transmitter in the 1950s Middle East, designed to accelerate Nasser’s propaganda campaign and extend the Afro-Asian range of Radio Cairo, was awarded to a German firm in Mannheim.

    Working in collaboration with von Leers was Louis al-Hadsch, alias Louis Heiden, a former chief of the Deutsche Press Agentur. Heiden distributed copies of Kifahi, his Arabic translation of Hitler’s Mein Kampf. 911,000 copies were sold in 1956-58 alone.

    Daniel Perret-Gentil, former Swiss SS Fizhrer, who worked for the Wehrmacht Intelligence Service in France during the war, and who was sentenced to death by Paris authorities in 1948 but expelled in 1955, was French Program Director of Radio Cairo.

    Continual contact was maintained between the Cairo propaganda bureaucracy and the many German-Arab organizations which mushroomed in order to strengthen the political, economic, cultural, and religious ties between Germany and the Islamic world.

    In the 1950s and 1960s, no other country could claim to have so many different organizations grouped for the same over-all purpose.

    Among them were the German-Arab Society, directed by former Nazi party member Horst Morgenbrod; the Near and Middle East Association with its Nazi adherents in Hamburg and headed by Dr. Ernst Messerschmidt; the German-Arab Association in Bonn; the German-Arab League in Heidelberg; the German Regional Eur-African Center in Bad Godesberg; Dr. Fakoussa’s German-Arab Institute in Bonn; the German-Egyptian Society, in Frankfurt, directed by Frau Ursula Beyrich; the Association of Overseas Interests, in Winsdorf; the Society of the Friends of Africa, in Berlin; and the North African Club, of Hamburg and Berlin, whose chief was Hans Peter Rullmann.

    Rullmann’s organization was known as a beehive of F.L.N https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Liberation_Front_(Algeria) activity in Germany. The North African Club, which spread propaganda against French rule in Algeria, was also reputed to be engaged in arms traffic, and actively promoted desertions from the French Foreign Legion.

    These collaborations which Germany fostered behind her superficial mask of peace and democracy, were not an innovation but a permanent characteristic of Real-politik. Regardless of passing events, these attributes are changeless. Yet into this witches’ brew of interlocking intrigues, emanating from Cairo and Bonn, other seething ingredients were added, bringing the mixture to the verge of a dangerous overflow.

    The Nazi German infiltrators were not just embedded in post-war West-Germany and the Middle-East, but also the Soviet Union and East-Germany.

    Ernst Grossmann, who was on the powerful East-German Central Committee of the ruling Socialist Unity Party, was formerly an SS guard at the Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp; Werner Winkler, Minister of Agriculture; Dr. Rubensam, Deputy Minister of Agriculture; Dr. Farchmin, Deputy Minister of Public Health; Dr.Hummeltenberg, Chief of Protocol for the East German Government; Herr Lange, a former Gestapo officer and a high official in the East German Secret Police.

    In the Pankow Parliament, Deputy Speaker Homann and forty-seven members were all active in the National Socialist Party. The judiciary in Soviet Germany was infiltrated with former Nazis. The President of the Supreme Court, Kurt Schumann, was a leading jurist of Nazi law. Supreme Court Justice Hetzar was also a prominent Nazi.

    The official lawyer of the Socialist Unity Party Professor Herbert Kroeger, was an SS Fuhrer. Kurt Blecha, who joined the Nazi party in 1941, was a propaganda specialist working for Herr Ulbricht, together with Horst Andress, who was a personal friend of Goebbels and formerly directed Nazi programs over the German Radio.

    While Germany and the Islamic world were strengthening their traditional ties with the East, they deftly manage to extort capital and concessions from the United States by exploiting to the maximum the American fear of Communism. And yet, Communist imperialism itself is an offspring of German Machiavellianism.

    It all started in April, 1917, when the German General Staff hastily dispatched Lenin and Trotzky from Switzerland to St. Petersburg through the German lines in a sealed train. Both revolutionaries were armed with the teachings of Karl Marx, and set off for Czarist Russia to foment internal chaos, completely disrupt the Russian war effort, and seize political power by launching the Communist Revolution.

    Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German Ambassador in the Danish capital during WW1, enthusiastically solicited the services of a Dr. Parvus, alias Dr. Helphand, a Bolshevik revolutionary who later turned to successful war profiteering in the Balkans.

    Like the extraordinary career of Zaharoff, Dr. Helphand’s sinister brand of revolutionary activity respected neither national frontiers nor ideologies.

    Both Brockdorff-Rantzau and Dr. Helphand, with the full (though clandestine) support of the German Government, methodically began to organize an extensive network of political conspiracy dedicated to one objective: a Communist revolution in Russia.

    In a secret report to the German Foreign Office during August, 1915, the Ambassador summarized the important work of Dr. Helphand:

    “The organization set up by Dr. Parvus in Copenhagen at present employs eight people in Copenhagen and about ten people traveling about inside Russia. The object of the work is to contact various personalities in Russia, since it is essential to coordinate the various movements now emerging. . . . Dr. Parvus has provided the organization with a sum to cover running ex-penses. . . .Hitherto, the whole thing has been so discreetly managed that not even the gentlemen working in the organization realize that our (German) government is behind it all.”

    “Dr. Parvus has heard that Lenin is coming to Stockholm. He can do little as he lacks funds; Dr. Parvus can support him only when the existing tension has settled.”

    By the end of 1915, as the German military position became more precarious on both the eastern and western fronts, Count Brockdorff-Rantzau was pressed to hasten the realization of the revolution in Russia. Reporting to Berlin at the time, he outlined his master plan and simultaneously boasted, in traditional Prussian fashion:

    “In victory, and in reward, world supremacy are ours, if Russia can be revolutionized in time and the coalition thereby broken up. Dr. Parvus thinks that he can point the way, and makes positive suggestions, backed by twenty years of experience.”

    Shortly afterwards, Dr. Helphand reported that the Russian Revolution would cost the German Government approximately twenty million rubles. Without hesitation, on December 26, 1915, the German Ambassador was given the authority by Berlin to make an advance payment of one million rubles. Dr. Helphand’s receipt, in signing for the money, is highly illuminating:

    “Received from the German Embassy in Copenhagen on the 29th of December, 1915, the sum of one million rubles in Russian banknotes for the promotion of the revolutionary movement in Russia. Dr. A. Helphand”

    As events subsequently proved, the Communist Revolution, ruthlessly organized, adequately financed, and offering, on the surface at least, a new revolutionary ideal for the war-weary and oppressed masses of Czarist Russia, succeeded as the Germans had planned and expected.

    The archives of the German Foreign Office further reveal that on December 3, 1917, Richard von Kuhlmann, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, had addressed a long telegram to the Kaiser at his Army headquarters. Outlining in broad detail the background of the remarkable aid and encouragement rendered the Communist Revolution by the German Government, it also emphasized the objectives of future German foreign policy that would insure its lasting success:

    “The disruption of the Entente and the subsequent creation of political combinations agreeable to us constitute the most important war aim of our diplomacy. Russia appeared to be the weakest link in the enemy’s chain. The task therefore was gradually to loosen it and, when possible, to remove it. This was the purpose of the subversive activity we caused to be carried out in Russia behind the front—in the first place the promotion of separatist tendencies and support of the Bolsheviks.”

    “It was not until the Bolsheviks had received from us a steady flow of funds through various channels and under varying labels that they were in a position to be able to build up their main organ, the Pravda, to conduct energetic propaganda, and appreciably to extend the originally narrow basis of their party. The Bolsheviks have now come to power; how long they will retain power cannot yet be foreseen. They need peace in order to strengthen their own position; on the other hand, it is entirely in our interest that we should exploit the period while they are in power, which may be a short one, in order to obtain firstly an armistice and then, if possible, peace.”

    This astonishing political opportunism, rarely equaled in the annals of history, nevertheless fostered in Germany a somewhat paternalistic attitude toward the Communist experiment, since she had been directly responsible for its creation.

    Consequently, German economic and military cooperation with the Russians was to develop in the future to the mutual benefit of both countries.

    Hans Kohn in the Christian Science Monitor of September 19, 1955, wrote;

    “The new conflict between Communist East and Democratic West, was directly Hitler’s work. Communism had been contained in Europe by the barrier of intermediary states from Finland to Rumania. Hitler destroyed this barrier and brought Stalin’s rule into Central Europe, first by his accord with Stalin in 1939 and then by his attack upon Stalin in 1941.”

    “It is one of the most disturbing factors in present-day Germany when some Germans reproach the Western powers for not having sided with Germany against Russia, and even add that it should have been done in defense of Western civilization. The Germans, and not the West, destroyed Poland and paved Stalin’s road westward. The Germans were then as much opposed to the West and Western civilization as the Russians were. Through German fault, the whole of continental Europe, with the exception of the two small enclaves of Sweden and Switzerland, was early in 1941 under the control of totalitarian powers, hostile to the individual liberalism, the freedom of thought, and the spirit of tolerance of the West. . . .”

    Nasser’s Egypt steered a sharp middle course between the Communist East and the Democratic West, shrewdly exploiting to the maximum, together with Germany, the tensions of the cold war, and thereby benefiting from the vast financial, technical, and military resources of both sides.

    “Middle East problems are for Middle East peoples to solve,” declared Nasser’s weekly Akhbar el-Yom of Cairo, in April 1956.

    “Neither Britain not Russia nor America nor France has the right to solve them. “We want no guardians. We have not authorized anyone to speak for us. We are not defendants being tried in absentia.” No reference was made to Germany.

    T. H. Tetens, American expert on German-Soviet affairs, wrote; “In the Middle East, the Germans have won a decisive victory, even if the Western world sees only the Russians in the headlines. The Germans do not appear to be disturbed by the present Soviet drive in Egypt which they helped to precipitate.
    It all works toward the deterioration of the Western position in Egypt and secures that country as an operational base for the Germans.”

    “The Germans will continue to undermine the Western position in the Arab world by a combination of skillfully directed intrigues, by Communist armament shipments, and by widespread propaganda on the Israeli issue. The Germans believe that the day is not far off when the French and the British will be pushed out for good. Countless articles in the West German press testify to the interest in the regions of Africa and the Middle East. Behind this interest is solid German Realpolitik.”

    “Once the British and French are out, the American oil companies will also be forced to give up. This will be the day when the Germans move in as ‘the friend of the Arabs.’ With sixty per cent of the world’s oil reserves in their control, with the Arabs as allies, and with Africa as hinterland, the German dream of a Third Power Bloc will come true.”

    The Western concept of free enterprise, drawing its inspiration from individual initiative, brooks little interference by a centralized government that would subordinate the freedom of its economic activities to the control of the state. In our democratic society, private economic enterprise, except during times of emergency, bears little relation to the government’s political objectives, apart from reasonable legislative safeguards.

    Business is conducted for its own rewards, thereby contributing to the national prosperity at large. And the personal satisfaction which is derived from the creation and completion of a project, along with advancing oneself in life, is considered an ideal end in itself.

    But the German mentality and instinct are quite different. The German businessman, during his activities as a representative of his firm abroad, carries on his work not only for its own sake, but also makes it serve toward the aim of realization of a greater Germany and enhancement of the Fatherland and foreign policy.

    He is well aware of the interdependent relationship of his country’s foreign policy, cultural penetration, and expanding world trade. Such attitudes and behavior are not puzzling when one considers the not-so-obvious fact that the German Government, despite all outward appearances, is a gigantic financial enterprise in its own right.

    The Bonn Government of 1960 (the only era for which we have reliable figures) held one billion dollars’ worth of stock in more than 3,000 companies. It owned at least seventy per cent of the nation’s total aluminum production, fifty per cent of the iron ore output, and thirty per cent of automobile production and shipbuilding. It also controlled twenty per cent of oil production and hard coal mining, and forty-five per cent of all zinc and lead output.

    Even the regional German states owned approximately 1300,000,000 of nominal capital in 430 firms.

    The big German enterprises are not truly private enterprises, but doing the bidding of Germany-proper.

    Inspired by both a commercial and national mission, and concerned less with immediate than with ultimate gains, the German’s historic goal in Egypt and the Middle East is to root his economic, military, and cultural influence firmly in the soil of his historic allies.

    The German economic drive in Egypt and the Arab world is nothing short of phenomenal. With an imperial eye toward the future, Nasser’s Egyptian/ United Arab Republic military regime organized its “planned Arab economy” along the lines of German “state capitalism.”

    And much to the shocked surprise of a visiting group of American businessmen exploring investment possibilities in the U.A.R., Colonel Nasser blandly declared on January 26, 1960, that he prefers intergovernmental loans and credits to private capital for the country’s development. This is to remove Western Capitalist influence via private enterprise – effectively closing the door to the West.

    State control of all individual economic activities was given added impetus when the National Bank of Egypt and Bank Misr were suddenly nationalized in early February of 1960. All major investments in the Nile Valley were made and controlled by the government-owned agency known as the “Economic Development Organization.” In his speech before the Cairo Economic Society, Ludwig Erhard, Germany’s economic czar at that time, proudly stated that Egypt was entitled to international aid after having “suffered from imperialists and colonialists.”

    From 1958 to 1960, the Bonn Government alone granted Cairo a global credit of 550,000,000 marks for the purchase of all types of industrial products: equipment for the expansion of the new Helwan steel mill built by Demag of Duisburg and employing 3,000 Egyptians; material for various public works projects; and all types of machinery and furnishings for the 115 factories which were established during this period.

    Cornerstones have already been laid to transform the Nile Valley into the “Ruhr of the Middle East.” The firm of Krupp Stahlbau Rheinhausen, manufacturers of heavy industrial equipment, developed the iron ore resources of the Aswan region. The German firm of Hoch-Tief AG completed the Aswan Hydro-Electric Power Station. After receiving long-term credits from the Bonn Government, the Siemens Group undertook the electrification of the entire Nile Delta area in 1963.

    Then there was the efficient work of Dr. Gerhard Kramer and some of his compatriots which contributed to the success of their Kulturpropaganda. While only five Egyptian high schools were holding seven German language classes during 1956 and 1957, in 1959 the figure increased to fifty-nine classes and sixteen high schools. Indeed, the Germans built other schools at an exceedingly rapid rate. In fact, the Bonn Government contributed eleven to fourteen per cent of the total Egyptian national budget for education! Toward the end of 1959, 5,538 Egyptians were studying abroad, sixty-three per cent of which were studying in Germany.

    This was happening simultaneously with the aforementioned German military advisors and technicians at work in the Nile Valley. The arrival of this military breed on the contemporary Egyptian scene, wearing the familiar, brown-peaked cap of the “Afrika Korps,” and hustling in and out of Abbassia Army Headquarters in their open jeeps, was an anomaly in this perplexing land.

    This sudden, rapid influx of German power and competition into the Nile Valley and the Middle East alarmed many Western observers of the time, who were greatly disturbed by the natural ease with which Germany forged ahead in an area riven with factional rivalries and violent anti-Western hatreds.

    Beneath the surface of German success in the Middle East—a success that is ultimately allied to the execution of a well-organized plan of further penetration and expansion—lie the natural evolving factors of history and national psychology.

    Drang nach Osten (drive to the East), is as much alive today and as compelling a force as it was in the Kaiser’s Reich and in Hitlerian Germany. It is still the route of traditional German self-expression, with Egypt and the Islamic world directly in its path.

    Germany is still seen today by members of the Muslim Brotherhood and other extreme Islamic groups bent on the idea of a Caliphate, as “Savior of Egypt and Islam,” the liberator of the Nile Valley from the “imperialistic” designs of Britain and her American and French allies, and the one symbol of international “virtue” which has never subjected Islam to domination or “colonial exploitation.”

    So pronounced is the German imprint upon the Muslim mind that a number of Pan-Islamic crusaders refer to the creation of an “Arab Reich.” In spite of brief, passing parades of democratic governments, a strong, autocratic leader continues to have a magnetic appeal to the German people.

    This same basic need for an all-powerful ruler also persists among the Islamic extremists working for a Caliphate.

    With the Muslim Bortherhood having taken power (for the moment) in Egypt after hijacking the Arab Spring – itself partly agitated by Germany, the reverberations of the new Islamic awakening resound throughout the entire Muslim world.

    From the depths of Prussian militarism, the rumbling of Deutschland uber Alles again stirs in its constant yearning for self-expression. As the German-allied Brotherhood covets the leadership of all Islam, so does Islamo-Fascism offer itself as a dependable bastion for Germany’s own expansionist aspirations.

    To Germany, willingly and enthusiastically, Egypt opens the gateway to a far-reaching Middle Eastern and African empire. The German dream of becoming a great colonial power in the Middle East and Africa with her own spheres of influence, frustrated by America, Britain, and France for over a century, is becoming a menacing reality! The game is nothing less than a German-run empire stretching through Europe and the Med, with pan-Islam as an ally-empire across the Middle East and Africa.

    And so, hopefully readers of this blog who question our comments on Germany’s links with Islamic terrorism and the 9/11 Hamburg cell, can see the ‘how and why’ of German and Islamic cooperation. This is one of the many reasons why the US and UK spy on Germany in a big way.

    The attacks on 9/11 – planned in Germany, executed mostly by Islamic extremists, was a symbol and outcome of the trust and continued cooperation between Germany and pan-Islamism.

    This trust and understanding between Islam and Germany, is part of the reason Yugoslavia was broken up in cahoots with radical Islam, shortly after Germany gained reunification itself. Destroying the final remnants of post-war treaties and geographical borders.

    http://germanywatch.blogspot.com/2013/07/germany-protector-of-radical-islam.html

  22. ROLAND EDGAR March 4, 2017 at 12:44 am #

    We all need to be aware of this:

    THE GERMAN ISLAM LINK

    “The Teutonic “superman” instinctively sensed that the Turkish Caliphate would be his natural ally. By the turn of the century, the destinies of both countries were inextricably linked. In 1898, Kaiser Wilhelm II vowed Germany’s eternal friendship for the Muslim world as he stood with Turkish leaders before the tomb of Saladin the Great in Damascus.”

    “This trust and understanding between Islam and Germany, is part of the reason Yugoslavia was broken up in cahoots with radical Islam, shortly after Germany gained reunification itself. Destroying the final remnants of post-war treaties and geographical borders.”

    For more also read:

    https://adarapress.com/2016/04/12/adolf-hitler-greatest-man-in-history-tweets-muslim-labour-counciler-in-uk-aysegul-gurbuz-20/

    https://adarapress.com/2015/12/05/like-clockwork-der-spiegel-published-the-timeline-in-2005-frightening-and-absurd-a-lunatic-plan-conceived-by-fanatics-and-now-for-the-sixth-phase/

    https://adarapress.com/2014/12/08/us-state-department-helped-shield-haj-amin-al-husseini-from-prosecution-for-war-crimes/

    https://adarapress.com/2014/11/22/nazi-money-and-post-war-terrorism/

    Germany – Protector Of Radical Islam

    With the current turmoil in the middle-east, and Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood clinging desperately to their new-found power in Egypt, a little history is in order to fully grasp the full picture of what is happening, and why Germany is involving itself with Islam.

    The history of modern German colonialism begins with the advent of Bismarck. Although at first preoccupied with the problems of the newly unified German states, he ultimately hastened to satisfy his imperialistic appetite by extending German power abroad. But the Prussian Chancellor’s decision to encourage the Reich’s penetration of Africa came very late, and Bismarck had to content himself with the residue of the other powers.

    The nineteenth century was an age of empire builders, with the scientific and economic might of England and France everywhere expanding. Britain had already occupied Egypt, colonized much of Africa, while France was firmly entrenched in Algeria and Tunisia. Now, with a cautious respect for London, Bismarck attempted to fish in the remaining colonial waters of the African Continent.

    With British consent, he managed to establish, in April, 1884, the first German protectorate on the southwestern coast of Africa. Eventually, German East Africa (Tangan-yika), Togoland, and the Cameroons were added to the glory of the Berlin Colonial Office. In 1905, the Reich was eliminated from the arena of colonization by Britain and France, when the latter recognized the establishment of a British protectorate over Egypt, in return for British acknowledgment of a French protectorate over Morocco.

    Germany violently protested against this arrangement, and the Kaiser hurriedly departed for Tangier in March of 1905, where he asserted his nation’s support for the independence of Morocco. Thus, by championing the cause of a Muslim people, Germany began to forge the chains between herself and the world of Islam. Germany finally acquiesced to French aspirations in Morocco in exchange for a small portion of Equatorial Africa.

    The Moroccan dispute, however, signaled the end to any further German acquisitions on the African continent. Subsequently, the Reich could only step aside and jealously watch the spoils of empire enhance the economic wealth and political prestige of her Western competitors.

    After only thirty years of colonization from 1884 to 1914, the Germans’ imprint and influence in the sections of Africa which they had administered, is still remembered. Although they have been officially gone from these regions for many years, the older natives still recalled right up through the 20th century, the brief period of tutelage under their former rulers, and did not conceal their respect for the harsh, authoritarian character of the Germans.

    The growing scientific and military might of the Reich, however, required still more room for expansion—far beyond the restricted national frontiers of central Europe and her comparatively insignificant African colonies. She was astir with aggressive economic power and productivity which needed new markets.

    But the door to further penetration in Africa had been closed by Britain and France. And so the Kaiser inevitably cast his eyes toward the fertile crescent and the Middle East as potential spheres of influence—areas rich in markets, oil, and raw materials.

    In order to fulfil this aspiration, the imagination of the German political leaders was fired with the idea of constructing a railroad to the East – Berlin to Baghdad. The central point between the heart of Germany and the remote interior of Mesopotamia was Constantinople, the capital of the Ottoman Empire. At a time when the apathetic ruler of the Turks was making a belated, almost desperate effort to reform, the Germans were irresistibly drawn to this imperial seat of Muslim empire.

    The Teutonic “superman” instinctively sensed that the Turkish Caliphate would be his natural ally.

    By the turn of the century, the destinies of both countries were inextricably linked. In 1898, Kaiser Wilhelm II vowed Germany’s eternal friendship for the Muslim world as he stood with Turkish leaders before the tomb of Saladin the Great in Damascus.

    During the years leading to the First World War, Berlin assumed more and more this role of “Protector of the Arabs” and “Savior of Islam,” a role which she has never relinquished. Even after the outbreak of war, with the encouragement of his German ally, the Ottoman Sultan-Caliph Muhammad Rashed invoked his subjects to rise in a jihad against the Western infidels.

    When the conflict brought unprecedented disaster to both nations in 1918 and the same judgment was passed upon both peoples, it was the German, more than the Turk, who remained true to his ideal. Although the Reich’s ambitions had been thwarted through her defeat and her African colonies had been lost, it did not at all destroy her ingrained militaristic nationalism or diminish her future lust for expansion.

    Meanwhile, at the supreme moment when Kaiser Germany and Muslim Turkey lay prostrate in defeat awaiting their punishment, Britain, France, and Russia proceeded to carve up for themselves the remnants of the vast Ottoman Empire with its rich Arab hinterland, according to the terms of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement negotiated between them as early as 1915 while the Great War was still in progress. As soon as this proposed plan for dividing up the Arab world was publicized, any trust which the lands of Islam may have placed in the Allied powers was forever dispelled.

    True, England especially had encouraged the Arabs to revolt against Turkish rule, yet it was unthinkable that a new sovereignty should be imposed on them by a European power.

    In vain did the delegation of Egyptian nationalist leaders strive to voice their grievances at the Versailles Conference of 1919, demanding that their cause be heard and that justice be rendered to Egyptian national aspirations for independence, in accordance with President Wilson’s Fourteen Point Program. They were rebuffed, along with all the other Muslim leaders who had arrived in Paris to plead their respective cases. A British protectorate over the land of the Pharaohs was included in the peace treaty, and the Egyptians were informed, in no uncertain terms, that the matter was officially closed.

    The repercussions throughout Egypt and Islam were instantaneous, with much help from German agitation. This was regarded, in the eyes of every Muslim, as a most sinister act of betrayal. The significance of this stab-in-the-back by the victorious European powers was clearly enunciated in a formal warning of vengeance by the Egyptian leaders in Paris in the Egyptian White Book of 1919. It is a grim reminder that Islam never forgets:

    “We have knocked at door after door, but have received no answer. In spite of the definitive pledges given by the statesmen at the head of the nations which won the war, to the effect that their victory would mean the triumph of right over might and the establishment of the principle of self-determination for small nations, the British protectorate over Egypt was written into the Treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain without the people of Egypt being consulted as to their political status. This crime against our nation, a breach of good faith on the part of the powers who have declared that they are forming in the same Treaty a Society of Nations, will not be consummated without a solemn warning that the people of Egypt consider the decision taken at Paris null and void. If our voice is not heard, it will be only because the blood already shed has not been enough to overthrow the old world-order and give birth to a new one.”

    As sporadic and sanguinary uprisings rocked the Middle East, a fanatical hatred for Christian imperialism burned within the breast of every Muslim.

    Without realizing it at the time, the Occidental powers had prepared a fertile breeding ground for the new Communist propaganda which lost no time in fanning the flames of anti-Western feeling, not only in the Middle East but throughout the restless, awakening Orient. If the Versailles Treaty had spelled calamity for Egypt and the Arab world, its effect upon Germany was quite different.

    The far-flung territories of the Turkish Empire had been reshuffled and refashioned to form new states and spheres of influence, but a defeated Germany had been left more or less geographically intact. As later events were to prove, the so-called harshness of this treaty was shrewdly exaggerated by German statesmen and politicians during the Weimar era of 1919-1932, in order to speedily resurrect their nation by appealing to the sympathy of the Western powers.

    The Allied occupation of Germany was of short duration, and German reparations were reduced to a meaningless figure when weighed against the generous and un-repaid loans she received from both Britain and the United States. Only fourteen years elapsed before Hitler arrived upon the scene, prepared for another onslaught against the world.

    In spite of the practical results effected by the Treaty, Versailles became the living symbol of perfidy to Germany, Egypt, and all Islam, welding them together for posterity in an indissoluble bond of trust and lasting friendship. Germany continued to be the “Savior of Islam.”

    Through the generosity of her former enemies, she rapidly rose from the ashes of defeat, again to assert her role as a great power. Between the two world wars, the old drive eastward was renewed, and German agents, technicians, and businessmen were soon re-established in the Middle East. Once more, the Germans had been irrevocably drawn to Islam. The outbreak of hostilities in 1939 found Germany militarily prepared to resume her historic drive to the East.

    The mission of finally uniting the cradle of Islam with the glory of the Third Reich fell to Rommel’s “Afrika Korps.” In 1942, during the early stages of the desert campaign, the situation of the Allies was pregnant with impending disaster. From within, it soon became obvious that Egypt and the Arab Middle East were secretly plotting to betray the democracies and welcome the Germans. In every country they controlled, the British swiftly rounded up all the pro-Axis political trouble-makers and exiled them, including Haj Amin al-Husseini, the ex-Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, and Rachid Ali Gailani, who had organized the unsuccessful Iraqi coup d’etat in 1941.

    The exiles fled to Turkey and finally took refuge in Berlin, where they worked hand in hand with the Germans for the remainder of the war.

    In Egypt, events took a similar course. The Egyptian Premier, Aly Maher Pasha, who had been entrusted with British defense plans for the country, was quick to deliver them to an Italian intelligence officer.

    Confronted with the alarming prospect of an Egyptian betrayal, as they had been in 1914 when they were forced to depose the pro-Turkish Khedive Abbas Hilmi and declare Egypt a protectorate of the empire, the British, as if time had stood still for twenty-eight years, repeated the identical operation.

    Surrounding Abdine Palace with troops and tanks, they compelled King Farouk to replace the pro-German Aly Maher with Mustapha Nahas, the leader of the Wafd. At least, the possibility of Egyptian interference had now been lessened, and the British could devote their full attention to Rommel’s advancing “Afrika Korps.” This desperate British maneuver to save Egypt and the Suez Canal from German conquest was regarded by the young Egyptian Army officers as an unforgivable act of treachery. The blow to their national pride served to inspire the underground formation of Nasser’s “Free Officers’ Movement,” and to strengthen their determination not only to avenge this humiliating action, but to further sabotage Britain’s already precarious position.

    As the on-rushing tide of German armoured columns lapped at the gates of Alexandria, the young group of Egyptian officers conceived their daring plan. Rommel was already at El Alamein, poised for the thrust which would deliver Egypt to the Germans and pave the way to hoisting the swastika over Suez and the Middle East. Their wild scheme, interestingly enough, was to be executed by Wing Commander Hassan Ibrahim, and Lieutenant Colonel Anwar al-Sadat, two of the most important members of Nasser’s military junta who later ruled Egypt.

    The third participant was General Aziz al-Masri, who later became the regime’s first ambassador to Moscow. The mission was a daring one, and its purpose was to furnish the Germans with secret information on British strategy and troop movements. Hassan Ibrahim provided his personal plane, and Anwar al-Sadat, together with General al-Masri, were to fly over the German lines and establish contact with them. But British Military Intelligence were on the alert. General al-Masri never got very far, and Anwar al-Sadat was intercepted as he attempted to carry out his part of the plan.

    This experience, however, has never been forgotten. Ten years later, on July 24, 1952, the day after the Revolution, Wing Commander Ibrahim, writing in the influential Cairo daily, Al-Ahram, recounted the story of this audacious undertaking:

    “In 1942, the Germans were at Alamein. We decided to send them an officer to offer them our assistance in the form of information on the British forces. … I was then the Commandant of the Director of Civil Aviation of Cairo, which allowed me to give my private plane to our emissary. We decided that our communications with the Germans would take the form of secret missions effected by a transmission officer, Anwar al-Sadat.

    Rommel’s objective had been the Suez Canal and the oil-rich Middle East. At the Battle of El Alamein, scarcely seventy miles from Alexandria, General Montgomery had obliterated that aspiration, as everyone believed, forever. For the second time in twenty-five years, Britain had prevented Germany from reaching the strategic waterway and the Middle East.

    But had El Alamein actually been the decisive blow to the constant, almost mystical German longing for union with the lands of Islam?

    As if the eighteen years had never been, by 1960 the invincible German Drang nach Osten, in the full vigor of its post-war renaissance, once again flourished in the Valley of the Nile and the lands of the fertile crescent. Perhaps the almost forgotten rows of orderly white crosses in the British and Commonwealth Cemetery at El Alamein, surrounded by the scorched and swirling sands of the Western desert, are but a mirage.

    Could that glorious battle have been a pyrrhic victory, a temporary armistice, while Germany patiently waited to undermine Britain’s declining influence and power?

    For by 1960, the ghost of the “Afrika Korps,” renewed and resolute, had at last attained its objective. Following the course of the Nile at a point in the geographical center of Egypt, where the city of Assiut is situated, there originates a range of uneven, reddish brown hills which winds its way southward toward the Valley of the Kings and ultimately to the cataracts of the Nile. Known as the Emerald Hills, these barren recesses still conceal many mysteries of the early Egyptian dynasties, but they also hid one of the most cleverly guarded secrets of the 1950s Cairo government.

    Here, dwelling in isolation, were a large number of adventurous Germans, well known for their wartime exploits in Egypt, whose pursuits are neither historical nor archeological. They were an amalgam of ex-Wehrmacht officers, including generals and colonels, majors and captains, and ex-Gestapo Storm Troopers. Most of them were former Rommel veterans busy clandestinely training thousands of Egyptian recruits for future combat.

    Long before the Battle of El Alamein in 1942, the desert had been the traditional landscape of the Islamic world.

    By 1960, among the endless sand dunes flanking the Nile Valley, the Egyptian Army trained for its special missions, endeavoring to master the tactics of desert warfare from the experienced brains of Rommel’s renowned “Afrika Korps.” The living remnant of his wartime staff and panzer divisions had been painstakingly gathered in order to transform the Egyptian Army into a crack, superior fighting force. Eighteen eventful years had passed, and the memory of Rommel’s exploits still haunted the silent battlefields of the Western desert and the minds of Cairo’s military leaders.

    The defeat of the “Afrika Korps” in 1942 had once again shattered the Pan-Germanic, Pan-Islamic dream, and left the Egyptian Army in a state of despair. Their own hopes of “liberation” had been temporarily dispelled, but the feats of Rommel in the North African campaign emerged in the postwar era as the most romantic of legends. In the Valley of the Nile, the study of Rommel as a brilliant tactician, and the implementation of his ideas on desert warfare, remained the basis of U.A.R. Army https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_Republic curriculum.

    This pro-German cult in Egypt, reaching to the point of hero-worship, increased steadily through the years and erupted in full tide when the military dictatorship seized power in July, 1952. Before his imprisonment in 1954, General Naguib himself had enunciated the official attitude of the regime toward the Germans:

    “They are the only ones in whom we have confidence.” During the course of an interview, he had further elaborated: “I want you to believe me when I say that I have not changed the great admiration I have for the Germans. Their efficiency, their extraordinary gifts as scientists and technicians, and their loyalty are quite unique. I have been noticing all these qualities in recent times, watching the work of the German officers and experts in my Army.”

    At the time of the Revolution, the new government’s Minister of Hygiene, Dr. Noureddine Tarraf, openly declared:

    “Hitler is the man of my life. The German dictator had been an ideal leader, who dedicated his life to the realization of his noble ambition. He never lived for himself, but for Germany and the German people. I have always wished to live like him.”

    Dr. Tarraf may never have had the opportunity of living like the Nazi demagogue, but the new generation in Egypt of the 1950s certainly did, since former leaders of the Hitler Youth Movement were training Egyptian youth organizations. Lieutenant-Colonel Anwar al-Sadat, intimate collaborator and personal friend of Nasser, held identical views, and his admiration for Hitler had not at all changed since his wartime “exploit” at El Alamein.

    In November of 1953, in reply to a questionnaire issued by Al-Mussawar, a prominent Egyptian weekly, regarding his appraisal of Hitler’s activities eight years after the latter’s death, and what advice he would offer the Fuhrer should he return, Colonel al-Sadat asserted:

    “Dear Hitler, I welcome you back with all my heart. You have been defeated, but in fact one should regard you as the real victor. There will be no peace in the world until Germany againtakes first place. Your principal mistake was in opening too many fronts, but everything has been forgiven, for you are a shining example of belief in one’s fatherland and people. You are eternal, and we shall not be surprised if we see you again, or a second Hitler, back in Germany.”

    While the new government ministers were singing the praises of Hitler, whom the fascist-Arabs refer to as “Abu Ali,” Otto Remer, who had saved the Fuhrer’s life in the Generals’ plot of 1944, and aspired to succeed him, fled to Egypt from West Germany to evade prosecution after his neo-Nazi party was banned.

    “The creation of a strong Arab army,” wrote Remer in the Nazi publication Der Weg in June, 1953, “is of immediate and direct concern to Germany’s patriotic forces which are prepared to offer the services of its best men.”

    Yet Remer was only one minor element of the central organization in Egypt which inexorably linked the German and Egyptian nations. The very nucleus of German activity in Cairo revolved round a notorious, globe-trotting, former SS Colonel, who was busy extending the network of mounting German influence and penetration throughout the Nile Valley, Africa, and the Middle East.

    Colonel Nasser’s chief military and geopolitical advisor, intimate foreign collaborator, and confidant, was none other than the full-blooded Nazi, SS Colonel Otto Skorzeny, who was dispatched to Cairo in 1953 upon the advice of his father-in-law, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s former financial wizard, now president of a Dusseldorf bank specializing in the promotion of German-Arab trade.

    Skorzeny’s reputation as a military expert, daring commando, political master-mind, and leading figure of the Fascist International, spread across four continents. He was one of the key conspirators in an international clandestine organization of exiled Nazis whose chief objective was to keep alive the ideology of National Socialism and to work from abroad for the strengthening and resurrection of a united Germany in its new bid for world power.

    This sinister network of neo-Nazi intrigue operated from the heart of the German colony in Madrid, and its activities and contacts extended to Dublin, Rome, Bonn, Berlin, Communist East Germany, the Soviet bloc, Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, as well as North and South America.

    On May 28, 1959, Skorzeny, en route to Ireland, was refused permission to land in England by British immigration authorities at London airport. He continued on to Dublin, which by then had replaced Madrid as his principal base of operations, and purchased a large farm outside the Irish capital. From there, he was in constant contact with Bonn and Cairo.

    Skorzeny first achieved prominence as the liberator of Mussolini through the most audacious exploits. His achievements thereafter reached such fantastic heights that he became a legendary figure. By 1960 Skorzeny, with the unlimited support and encouragement of the Egyptian military regime, worked inconspicuously under the facade of a respectable import-export firm in Cairo. But his products were of a very special kind. He did not trouble himself with the ordinary trifles of Parisian perfumes or full-fashioned nylon stockings.

    For the exclusive use of the U.A.R. Army, he imported any brand of unemployed ex-Wehrmacht soldiers, offering them infinite scope for their professional skills.

    Qualifications for these positions were simple but unique: a strong faith in the Nazi ideology; a passionate prejudice against anything American, British, French, or Israeli; and an unequivocal acceptance of Gamal Abdel Nasser as the new Egyptian Fuhrer and aspiring Fuhrer of the entire Muslim world. Military prowess, of course, was a primary requirement.

    Another of his major activities was the arms traffic, and his contacts and agents were world-wide, even extending behind the Iron Curtain. One of his outstanding maneouvers admirably displayed his unsurpassed talent for international intrigue.

    Always available to stir up trouble for the West, Skorzeny personally arranged with General Franco for the sale of $3,500,000 worth of military equipment including shells, mortars, and machine guns to Egypt. This secret transaction was effected through an intermediary company in Switzerland, and the arms were particularly adaptable for hit-and-run attacks.

    Yet this was only part of the work of his global network to insure the continuous shipment of armaments to Egypt and the Arab countries.

    Through Skorzeny’s international web of intrigue, former German U-boat officers were hired to help staff and train crews for the new submarines which Nasser received from the Soviet Union.

    From the main European headquarters of the Muslim Brotherhood in Frankfurt-am-Main and its branch in Bremen, special recruitment centers had been organized in Hamburg, Munich, and Hanover to guarantee a steady flow of military technicians to the United Arab Republic.

    In Leipzig, East Germany, a special employment unit for the same purpose was established with the full knowledge of Moscow.

    Through these semi-official channels passed such infamous personalities as SS General Dirlewanger, the liquidator of Poland’s Jewish population, universally known as the “Butcher of Warsaw,” who became Nasser’s special advisor on guerrilla warfare.

    Accompanying him to the Middle East as military advisor to the Egyptian Army went SS Colonel Adolph Eichmann, who was the intimate collaborator of the Grand Mufti during World War II and the Nazi fanatic responsible for the extermination of all Jews in the areas of German occupation. From the Arab countries, Eichmann eventually moved on to Argentina via Spain.

    In Egypt, Skorzeny’s primary responsibility was the equipping, organizing, and training of thousands of zealous commandos, who were rigorously prepared in the Emerald Hills for guerrilla and desert warfare to serve as an “Army of Liberation” against Israel. At regular intervals, bands of F.L.N https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Liberation_Front_(Algeria) terrorists were also trained for operations against the French in Algeria.

    Working in key positions with the Algerian Rebel Government in Cairo were four fanatical exiled Nazis who assumed Arab names. SS Sturmfuhrer Baumann, known as Ali ben Khader, who was Einsatzkommando in the unit which tortured women and children in the Warsaw Ghetto; Willi Berner, then Ben Kashir, a former SA Fuhrer and a guard in the Mauthausen Concentration Camp; Karl Luder, then Abdel Kader, a former Hitler youth leader in Danzig and a commando who served in a number of concentration camps; and Dr. Erich Alten, then Ali Bella, who played a major role in the assassination of Professor Theodor Lessing at Carlsbad in 1934, and who was Gestapo “Commissar for Jews” in Galicia during the war.

    As a double insurance against another defeat by the Israeli Army, the Nasser regime formed an Arab Foreign Legion to fight against the Jewish state. Its nucleus consisted of 400 former Nazis and Gestapo veterans, who were recruited by Arab League agents in Germany.

    Adami’s career was by no means been a dull one, or lacking in adventure. In the days of the Weimar Republic, he was a member of the extreme right-wing organization called the “Scharnhorst Free Corps,” which participated in the Kapp Putsch of 1920. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapp_Putsch

    During the last war, he was a Gestapo Storm Trooper and served in Poland with the Dirlewanger Extermination Brigade. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger He was active in Otto Remer’s outlawed Reichspartei, and for a time earned his livelihood by selling pornographic photographs and anti-Semitic publications.

    In 1957, he was hired by Arab agents to sign up volunteers for the Arab Legion from the many SS veterans’ organizations. For every recruit he sent on to Cairo, he was paid commissions ranging from $500 to $750.

    Colonel Nasser himself was the supreme authority over all Commando units and the Arab Foreign Legion while Skorzeny was responsible for the human consignments of German military experts, armament technicians, and espionage agents in quest of adventure, self-expression, and a greater Germany.

    Those applicants selected for special assignments as agents were merely required to have enough knowledge of political intrigue to sense the growing importance of Egypt in Germany’s master plan and new bid for world leadership.

    For export, Skorzeny offered an unusual assortment of psychological warfare, subversive propaganda, political conspiracy, up-to-date information on arranging the perfect coup d’etat, and a natural genius for cynical Real-politik.

    Skorzeny took an active though clandestine role in most of the controversial political events in the Middle East. Every alert Middle East media correspondent of the era, knew that it was he who engineered the operation in 1955 which brought Shukri el-Kuwatly back to Damascus from Cairo and installed him as president of Syria.

    Thus the way was prepared for the Syrian-Egyptian anschluss, creating the United Arab Republic in February, 1958. The Syrian armed forces of the U.A.R. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_Republic were reorganized and advised by a military mission headed by ex-Wehrmacht Colonels Rainer Kriebel and Heinz Heigel.

    The elite of Germany’s military skill had all been imported through Skorzeny’s “underground railroad” and with the unofficial approval of the Bonn Government. The original military advisory group in the country had been headed by former SS Lieutenant General Wilhelm Farmbacher and his assistant, Panzer Major General Oskar Munzel. Major Mertins was the specialist who had organized the Egyptian Parachute Corps.

    By 1960 Nasser’s State Security Cadre (SSC), formed along the lines of Hitler’s Schutz Staffen (SS), was an internal Gestapo-like force of 70,000 men, whose officers were mostly Arabized Nazis with headquarters in Cairo’s Liberation Square.

    They were under the direction of Lieutenant Colonel Al-Nasher, whose real identity was Leopold Gleim, chief of Hitler’s personal guard and Gestapo Security Chief of German-occupied Poland, who was sentenced to death for war atrocities.

    Also within the Cairo administrative hierarchy was an Advisor on Special Activities, Joachim Daemling, former Chief of the Gestapo in Dusseldorf. He was responsible for the efficient organization of the Egyptian Secret Police and especially for the establishment of concentration camps at El-Kanater and Abu-Sabal, near Cairo; at Maharik in Upper Egypt; at Qena, in the vicinity of the Ptolemaic Temple of Denderah; at El-Kharga, deep in the Western desert; and at Samara, about 135 miles southwest of Alexandria, which had been patterned on photocopies of the infamous German extermination camp of Dachau.

    The entire camp network was under the medical supervision of two special Nazi experts: Dr. Hans Eisele, chief physician at Buchenwald concentration camp; and SS Hauptstabsarzt Heinrich Willermann, known as Lieutenant Colonel Naim Fahum, former medical director at Dachau.

    The Egyptian Security Police, in charge of the nation’s prisons, was headed by Colonel Ben Salem, alias SS Fiihrer Bernhardt Bender. Chief of the Intelligence Service of the Wehrmacht Security Division in the Ukraine during the war, Bender organized all Egyptian prisons along Gestapo lines.

    Colonel Hassan Suleiman, who in reality was the Sudeten German SS Gruppenfuhrer Moser, together with his assistant, SS Gruppenfuhrer Buble, known as Lieutenant Colonel Amman, ws in charge of training Egyptian youth along the lines of the Hitler Jugend.

    Behind the abrupt dismissal of British General Glubb Pasha by the Jordanian monarch on March 1, 1956, were the SS specialists in Cairo. The startling facts surrounding this event are known by American and British Intelligence, but remain a well-kept secret.

    At first, neither Britain nor America saw any cause for alarm over the activities of these “German specialists.” Nevertheless, on May 11, 1953, Sir Winston Churchill brought up the subject in the House of Commons and stated that the Egyptian Army “was being aided and trained by Nazi instructors and staff officers in unusual numbers.”

    He subsequently discussed the matter with German Chancellor Adenauer, who disclaimed any responsibility and merely promised to institute an investigation.

    Only the French, with their Cartesian sense of realism, thought that the presence of so many Germans in the Nile Valley was an ominous sign and could not be taken lightly nor easily explained. Devoid of illusion, they rightly concluded that the Germans were in Egypt for the express purpose of re-establishing their power and influence in the Middle East at the expense of the United States, Britain, and France.

    As the 1960s got under way, Germany and Egypt continued to abound with renewed industrial activity. In many ways, Egypt resembled a German military outpost, as more and more technicians, salesmen, experts, material, and unlimited capital poured into the Valley of the Nile.

    The economic and technical expert of German specialists, Dr. Wilhelm Voss, former Nazi director of the Skoda arms factory in Czechoslovakia and the Hermann Goering Steel Mills, was the real architect of the U.A.R. economy.

    Plans were advanced for the construction of armament factories in Egypt and the Sudan as joint enterprises of the Nasser regime and the Ruhr industrial giant, Alfred Krupp, with the full encouragement of the Bonn Government.

    Skorzeny’s political and economic web of intrigue thus carried Egypt to the heart of the Ruhr Valley and deposited her on the threshold of Germany’s war-making potential.

    Together with Dr. Voss, Skorzeny channeled a great deal of the profitable Egyptian trade through the Dusseldorf firm of H. S. Lucht, an import-export house owned and directed by Werner Naumann, former Secretary of State in the dreaded Gestapo Ministry of Heinrich Himmler.

    Most of the financial dealings of Naumann’s firm passed through Dr. Schacht’s bank in Dusseldorf, whose Nazi economic theories, carried on by Dr. Voss and imposed by Nasser, were adopted as the foundation for the U.A.R “state economy.”

    In 1953, when neo-Nazi activities in Germany were already well advanced and had become too conspicuous, Naumann and seven of his collaborators were arrested by the British occupation authorities for plotting, at home and abroad, with Skorzeny’s world-wide network to overthrow the Bonn government and establish a dictatorship.

    Among the seven arrested conspirators was Dr. Gustav Scheel, former leader of the Nazi Students’ League, and also the close friend of the Grand Mufti.

    Dr. Scheel had introduced Haj Amin al-Husseini to Hitler, and later smuggled him out of occupied Germany into Switzerland. The Naumann scandal greatly irritated Dr. Adenauer’s government, which tried to minimize the significance of the sensational expose. They had the effrontery to accuse the British of meddling in Germany’s internal affairs!

    The evidence of British Intelligence was so conclusive (several shipping containers full) however, that Thomas Dehler, then Bonn Minister of Justice, belatedly announced, four months after the arrests: “The Naumann Circle represented one of the greatest dangers to Germany. Its aim was to seize power after the forthcoming election, which was supposed to be the last consultation of a free people.”

    It was also the shrewd hand of Dr. Voss behind the scenes, which drew up the detailed plans stressing the advantages to be gained by Egypt in obtaining Communist arms. vOn October 26, 1955, the well-informed German news magazine, Der Spiegel, reported that Voss “initiated the big armament deal with the Czech agents—Prantel, Nohinec, and Rostrum—who operated behind the facade of refugees, but who in reality were Communist agents.”

    Regardless of time, circumstance, and changing methods, the extreme right and left continue to work together. One is somehow reminded of Hitler’s classic remark to Hermann Rauschning:

    “There is no essential difference between the ideals of National Socialism and those of Marxism.”

    In Cairo, Skorzeny’s mission was to firmly ally Egypt and the Muslim world with Germany, and decisively destroy American, British, and French influence in the Middle East and Africa. In short, he and his global underground organization were the unofficial eyes and ears of Bonn’s foreign office, and the chief architects of its double-faced diplomacy.

    Both Skorzeny and Dr. Voss maintained constant and intimate contact with Chancellor Adenauer’s personal advisors, Professor Walter Hallstein, then president of the West European Common Market, and Dr. Herbert Blankenhorn, Bonn’s ambassador to Paris.

    All Cairo buzzed with gossip for weeks in 1954 when Dr. Gunther Pawelke, the official West German ambassador in Egypt, angrily resigned, protesting that more confidence and encouragement were accorded to Voss and Skorzeny by the Adenauer Government than to their own official representatives.

    Skorzeny’s ultimate aim was to create, in conjunction with Nasser, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Arab League, a German-Egyptian dominated third-power bloc and empire stretching from Berlin to Capetown, and from Bonn to New Delhi.

    The time was not yet ripe, however, to unmask themselves and operate in the open.

    Nasser and the Grand Mufti threw wide open the influential doors of the Egyptian-dominated Arab League to their German ally. Into the secret cornerstone of the League’s policy was lodged a program calling for the fullest cooperation and preference for German commerce and aspirations in the Middle East.

    The Mufti’s admiration for Germany was boundless, and he defined the Germans as “a people with boldness, perseverance, toughness, and a love of order.”

    According to him, “Every Muslim throughout the world is a friend of the Germans.”

    In the fields of political and psychological warfare, vicious anti-Western and anti-Israeli propaganda was unremittingly carried on by the Nasser regime under the direction of Johann von Leers, one of the former high-ranking Nazi propagandists in the Berlin Foreign Ministry. Von Leers, who was considered a specialist on racial questions, was also the author of a great number of anti-Semitic publications. Later converting to Islam, he assumed the Arabized name of Oman Amin von Leers.

    In the May 29, 1953 issue of the neo-Nazi journal, Deutschland-Brief, von Leers violently attacks the Protestant Confessional Church for its opposition to Hitler, and praises the natural affinities between the German and Arab peoples. Advancing the theory that this factor enabled Islam to carry on a successful campaign of conversion in Germany, he predicts that the Germans will eventually turn their backs on Christianity and embrace Islam.

    “This,” he writes, “is no doubt due to the moving humanitarian reception which hundreds, perhaps thousands of German refugees, found after the war among the Muslims of the Middle East. Islam’s simple all-God doctrine which is not tied to Judaism, and its enmity against the Jews, won the allegiance of many of these refugees. The repercussions are gradually being felt in Germany.”

    Von Leers’ special activities on behalf of the Egyptian military regime were carefully camouflaged until he was discovered and unmasked in 1956 by William Stevenson of the Toronto Star and Ann Sharpley of the London Evening Standard. This sudden, embarrassing exposure prompted Nasser to act quickly, and both correspondents were hastily expelled from the country.

    Von Leers’ job was to draft and coordinate all foreign propaganda for the Cairo government. Through his office, the contract for the construction of the largest and most powerful radio transmitter in the 1950s Middle East, designed to accelerate Nasser’s propaganda campaign and extend the Afro-Asian range of Radio Cairo, was awarded to a German firm in Mannheim.

    Working in collaboration with von Leers was Louis al-Hadsch, alias Louis Heiden, a former chief of the Deutsche Press Agentur. Heiden distributed copies of Kifahi, his Arabic translation of Hitler’s Mein Kampf. 911,000 copies were sold in 1956-58 alone.

    Daniel Perret-Gentil, former Swiss SS Fizhrer, who worked for the Wehrmacht Intelligence Service in France during the war, and who was sentenced to death by Paris authorities in 1948 but expelled in 1955, was French Program Director of Radio Cairo.

    Continual contact was maintained between the Cairo propaganda bureaucracy and the many German-Arab organizations which mushroomed in order to strengthen the political, economic, cultural, and religious ties between Germany and the Islamic world.

    In the 1950s and 1960s, no other country could claim to have so many different organizations grouped for the same over-all purpose.

    Among them were the German-Arab Society, directed by former Nazi party member Horst Morgenbrod; the Near and Middle East Association with its Nazi adherents in Hamburg and headed by Dr. Ernst Messerschmidt; the German-Arab Association in Bonn; the German-Arab League in Heidelberg; the German Regional Eur-African Center in Bad Godesberg; Dr. Fakoussa’s German-Arab Institute in Bonn; the German-Egyptian Society, in Frankfurt, directed by Frau Ursula Beyrich; the Association of Overseas Interests, in Winsdorf; the Society of the Friends of Africa, in Berlin; and the North African Club, of Hamburg and Berlin, whose chief was Hans Peter Rullmann.

    Rullmann’s organization was known as a beehive of F.L.N https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Liberation_Front_(Algeria) activity in Germany. The North African Club, which spread propaganda against French rule in Algeria, was also reputed to be engaged in arms traffic, and actively promoted desertions from the French Foreign Legion.

    These collaborations which Germany fostered behind her superficial mask of peace and democracy, were not an innovation but a permanent characteristic of Real-politik. Regardless of passing events, these attributes are changeless. Yet into this witches’ brew of interlocking intrigues, emanating from Cairo and Bonn, other seething ingredients were added, bringing the mixture to the verge of a dangerous overflow.

    The Nazi German infiltrators were not just embedded in post-war West-Germany and the Middle-East, but also the Soviet Union and East-Germany.

    Ernst Grossmann, who was on the powerful East-German Central Committee of the ruling Socialist Unity Party, was formerly an SS guard at the Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp; Werner Winkler, Minister of Agriculture; Dr. Rubensam, Deputy Minister of Agriculture; Dr. Farchmin, Deputy Minister of Public Health; Dr.Hummeltenberg, Chief of Protocol for the East German Government; Herr Lange, a former Gestapo officer and a high official in the East German Secret Police.

    In the Pankow Parliament, Deputy Speaker Homann and forty-seven members were all active in the National Socialist Party. The judiciary in Soviet Germany was infiltrated with former Nazis. The President of the Supreme Court, Kurt Schumann, was a leading jurist of Nazi law. Supreme Court Justice Hetzar was also a prominent Nazi.

    The official lawyer of the Socialist Unity Party Professor Herbert Kroeger, was an SS Fuhrer. Kurt Blecha, who joined the Nazi party in 1941, was a propaganda specialist working for Herr Ulbricht, together with Horst Andress, who was a personal friend of Goebbels and formerly directed Nazi programs over the German Radio.

    While Germany and the Islamic world were strengthening their traditional ties with the East, they deftly manage to extort capital and concessions from the United States by exploiting to the maximum the American fear of Communism. And yet, Communist imperialism itself is an offspring of German Machiavellianism.

    It all started in April, 1917, when the German General Staff hastily dispatched Lenin and Trotzky from Switzerland to St. Petersburg through the German lines in a sealed train. Both revolutionaries were armed with the teachings of Karl Marx, and set off for Czarist Russia to foment internal chaos, completely disrupt the Russian war effort, and seize political power by launching the Communist Revolution.

    Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German Ambassador in the Danish capital during WW1, enthusiastically solicited the services of a Dr. Parvus, alias Dr. Helphand, a Bolshevik revolutionary who later turned to successful war profiteering in the Balkans.

    Like the extraordinary career of Zaharoff, Dr. Helphand’s sinister brand of revolutionary activity respected neither national frontiers nor ideologies.

    Both Brockdorff-Rantzau and Dr. Helphand, with the full (though clandestine) support of the German Government, methodically began to organize an extensive network of political conspiracy dedicated to one objective: a Communist revolution in Russia.

    In a secret report to the German Foreign Office during August, 1915, the Ambassador summarized the important work of Dr. Helphand:

    “The organization set up by Dr. Parvus in Copenhagen at present employs eight people in Copenhagen and about ten people traveling about inside Russia. The object of the work is to contact various personalities in Russia, since it is essential to coordinate the various movements now emerging. . . . Dr. Parvus has provided the organization with a sum to cover running ex-penses. . . .Hitherto, the whole thing has been so discreetly managed that not even the gentlemen working in the organization realize that our (German) government is behind it all.”

    “Dr. Parvus has heard that Lenin is coming to Stockholm. He can do little as he lacks funds; Dr. Parvus can support him only when the existing tension has settled.”

    By the end of 1915, as the German military position became more precarious on both the eastern and western fronts, Count Brockdorff-Rantzau was pressed to hasten the realization of the revolution in Russia. Reporting to Berlin at the time, he outlined his master plan and simultaneously boasted, in traditional Prussian fashion:

    “In victory, and in reward, world supremacy are ours, if Russia can be revolutionized in time and the coalition thereby broken up. Dr. Parvus thinks that he can point the way, and makes positive suggestions, backed by twenty years of experience.”

    Shortly afterwards, Dr. Helphand reported that the Russian Revolution would cost the German Government approximately twenty million rubles. Without hesitation, on December 26, 1915, the German Ambassador was given the authority by Berlin to make an advance payment of one million rubles. Dr. Helphand’s receipt, in signing for the money, is highly illuminating:

    “Received from the German Embassy in Copenhagen on the 29th of December, 1915, the sum of one million rubles in Russian banknotes for the promotion of the revolutionary movement in Russia. Dr. A. Helphand”

    As events subsequently proved, the Communist Revolution, ruthlessly organized, adequately financed, and offering, on the surface at least, a new revolutionary ideal for the war-weary and oppressed masses of Czarist Russia, succeeded as the Germans had planned and expected.

    The archives of the German Foreign Office further reveal that on December 3, 1917, Richard von Kuhlmann, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, had addressed a long telegram to the Kaiser at his Army headquarters. Outlining in broad detail the background of the remarkable aid and encouragement rendered the Communist Revolution by the German Government, it also emphasized the objectives of future German foreign policy that would insure its lasting success:

    “The disruption of the Entente and the subsequent creation of political combinations agreeable to us constitute the most important war aim of our diplomacy. Russia appeared to be the weakest link in the enemy’s chain. The task therefore was gradually to loosen it and, when possible, to remove it. This was the purpose of the subversive activity we caused to be carried out in Russia behind the front—in the first place the promotion of separatist tendencies and support of the Bolsheviks.”

    “It was not until the Bolsheviks had received from us a steady flow of funds through various channels and under varying labels that they were in a position to be able to build up their main organ, the Pravda, to conduct energetic propaganda, and appreciably to extend the originally narrow basis of their party. The Bolsheviks have now come to power; how long they will retain power cannot yet be foreseen. They need peace in order to strengthen their own position; on the other hand, it is entirely in our interest that we should exploit the period while they are in power, which may be a short one, in order to obtain firstly an armistice and then, if possible, peace.”

    This astonishing political opportunism, rarely equaled in the annals of history, nevertheless fostered in Germany a somewhat paternalistic attitude toward the Communist experiment, since she had been directly responsible for its creation.

    Consequently, German economic and military cooperation with the Russians was to develop in the future to the mutual benefit of both countries.

    Hans Kohn in the Christian Science Monitor of September 19, 1955, wrote;

    “The new conflict between Communist East and Democratic West, was directly Hitler’s work. Communism had been contained in Europe by the barrier of intermediary states from Finland to Rumania. Hitler destroyed this barrier and brought Stalin’s rule into Central Europe, first by his accord with Stalin in 1939 and then by his attack upon Stalin in 1941.”

    “It is one of the most disturbing factors in present-day Germany when some Germans reproach the Western powers for not having sided with Germany against Russia, and even add that it should have been done in defense of Western civilization. The Germans, and not the West, destroyed Poland and paved Stalin’s road westward. The Germans were then as much opposed to the West and Western civilization as the Russians were. Through German fault, the whole of continental Europe, with the exception of the two small enclaves of Sweden and Switzerland, was early in 1941 under the control of totalitarian powers, hostile to the individual liberalism, the freedom of thought, and the spirit of tolerance of the West. . . .”

    Nasser’s Egypt steered a sharp middle course between the Communist East and the Democratic West, shrewdly exploiting to the maximum, together with Germany, the tensions of the cold war, and thereby benefiting from the vast financial, technical, and military resources of both sides.

    “Middle East problems are for Middle East peoples to solve,” declared Nasser’s weekly Akhbar el-Yom of Cairo, in April 1956.

    “Neither Britain not Russia nor America nor France has the right to solve them. “We want no guardians. We have not authorized anyone to speak for us. We are not defendants being tried in absentia.” No reference was made to Germany.

    T. H. Tetens, American expert on German-Soviet affairs, wrote; “In the Middle East, the Germans have won a decisive victory, even if the Western world sees only the Russians in the headlines. The Germans do not appear to be disturbed by the present Soviet drive in Egypt which they helped to precipitate.
    It all works toward the deterioration of the Western position in Egypt and secures that country as an operational base for the Germans.”

    “The Germans will continue to undermine the Western position in the Arab world by a combination of skillfully directed intrigues, by Communist armament shipments, and by widespread propaganda on the Israeli issue. The Germans believe that the day is not far off when the French and the British will be pushed out for good. Countless articles in the West German press testify to the interest in the regions of Africa and the Middle East. Behind this interest is solid German Realpolitik.”

    “Once the British and French are out, the American oil companies will also be forced to give up. This will be the day when the Germans move in as ‘the friend of the Arabs.’ With sixty per cent of the world’s oil reserves in their control, with the Arabs as allies, and with Africa as hinterland, the German dream of a Third Power Bloc will come true.”

    The Western concept of free enterprise, drawing its inspiration from individual initiative, brooks little interference by a centralized government that would subordinate the freedom of its economic activities to the control of the state. In our democratic society, private economic enterprise, except during times of emergency, bears little relation to the government’s political objectives, apart from reasonable legislative safeguards.

    Business is conducted for its own rewards, thereby contributing to the national prosperity at large. And the personal satisfaction which is derived from the creation and completion of a project, along with advancing oneself in life, is considered an ideal end in itself.

    But the German mentality and instinct are quite different. The German businessman, during his activities as a representative of his firm abroad, carries on his work not only for its own sake, but also makes it serve toward the aim of realization of a greater Germany and enhancement of the Fatherland and foreign policy.

    He is well aware of the interdependent relationship of his country’s foreign policy, cultural penetration, and expanding world trade. Such attitudes and behavior are not puzzling when one considers the not-so-obvious fact that the German Government, despite all outward appearances, is a gigantic financial enterprise in its own right.

    The Bonn Government of 1960 (the only era for which we have reliable figures) held one billion dollars’ worth of stock in more than 3,000 companies. It owned at least seventy per cent of the nation’s total aluminum production, fifty per cent of the iron ore output, and thirty per cent of automobile production and shipbuilding. It also controlled twenty per cent of oil production and hard coal mining, and forty-five per cent of all zinc and lead output.

    Even the regional German states owned approximately 1300,000,000 of nominal capital in 430 firms.

    The big German enterprises are not truly private enterprises, but doing the bidding of Germany-proper.

    Inspired by both a commercial and national mission, and concerned less with immediate than with ultimate gains, the German’s historic goal in Egypt and the Middle East is to root his economic, military, and cultural influence firmly in the soil of his historic allies.

    The German economic drive in Egypt and the Arab world is nothing short of phenomenal. With an imperial eye toward the future, Nasser’s Egyptian/ United Arab Republic military regime organized its “planned Arab economy” along the lines of German “state capitalism.”

    And much to the shocked surprise of a visiting group of American businessmen exploring investment possibilities in the U.A.R., Colonel Nasser blandly declared on January 26, 1960, that he prefers intergovernmental loans and credits to private capital for the country’s development. This is to remove Western Capitalist influence via private enterprise – effectively closing the door to the West.

    State control of all individual economic activities was given added impetus when the National Bank of Egypt and Bank Misr were suddenly nationalized in early February of 1960. All major investments in the Nile Valley were made and controlled by the government-owned agency known as the “Economic Development Organization.” In his speech before the Cairo Economic Society, Ludwig Erhard, Germany’s economic czar at that time, proudly stated that Egypt was entitled to international aid after having “suffered from imperialists and colonialists.”

    From 1958 to 1960, the Bonn Government alone granted Cairo a global credit of 550,000,000 marks for the purchase of all types of industrial products: equipment for the expansion of the new Helwan steel mill built by Demag of Duisburg and employing 3,000 Egyptians; material for various public works projects; and all types of machinery and furnishings for the 115 factories which were established during this period.

    Cornerstones have already been laid to transform the Nile Valley into the “Ruhr of the Middle East.” The firm of Krupp Stahlbau Rheinhausen, manufacturers of heavy industrial equipment, developed the iron ore resources of the Aswan region. The German firm of Hoch-Tief AG completed the Aswan Hydro-Electric Power Station. After receiving long-term credits from the Bonn Government, the Siemens Group undertook the electrification of the entire Nile Delta area in 1963.

    Then there was the efficient work of Dr. Gerhard Kramer and some of his compatriots which contributed to the success of their Kulturpropaganda. While only five Egyptian high schools were holding seven German language classes during 1956 and 1957, in 1959 the figure increased to fifty-nine classes and sixteen high schools. Indeed, the Germans built other schools at an exceedingly rapid rate. In fact, the Bonn Government contributed eleven to fourteen per cent of the total Egyptian national budget for education! Toward the end of 1959, 5,538 Egyptians were studying abroad, sixty-three per cent of which were studying in Germany.

    This was happening simultaneously with the aforementioned German military advisors and technicians at work in the Nile Valley. The arrival of this military breed on the contemporary Egyptian scene, wearing the familiar, brown-peaked cap of the “Afrika Korps,” and hustling in and out of Abbassia Army Headquarters in their open jeeps, was an anomaly in this perplexing land.

    This sudden, rapid influx of German power and competition into the Nile Valley and the Middle East alarmed many Western observers of the time, who were greatly disturbed by the natural ease with which Germany forged ahead in an area riven with factional rivalries and violent anti-Western hatreds.

    Beneath the surface of German success in the Middle East—a success that is ultimately allied to the execution of a well-organized plan of further penetration and expansion—lie the natural evolving factors of history and national psychology.

    Drang nach Osten (drive to the East), is as much alive today and as compelling a force as it was in the Kaiser’s Reich and in Hitlerian Germany. It is still the route of traditional German self-expression, with Egypt and the Islamic world directly in its path.

    Germany is still seen today by members of the Muslim Brotherhood and other extreme Islamic groups bent on the idea of a Caliphate, as “Savior of Egypt and Islam,” the liberator of the Nile Valley from the “imperialistic” designs of Britain and her American and French allies, and the one symbol of international “virtue” which has never subjected Islam to domination or “colonial exploitation.”

    So pronounced is the German imprint upon the Muslim mind that a number of Pan-Islamic crusaders refer to the creation of an “Arab Reich.” In spite of brief, passing parades of democratic governments, a strong, autocratic leader continues to have a magnetic appeal to the German people.

    This same basic need for an all-powerful ruler also persists among the Islamic extremists working for a Caliphate.

    With the Muslim Bortherhood having taken power (for the moment) in Egypt after hijacking the Arab Spring – itself partly agitated by Germany, the reverberations of the new Islamic awakening resound throughout the entire Muslim world.

    From the depths of Prussian militarism, the rumbling of Deutschland uber Alles again stirs in its constant yearning for self-expression. As the German-allied Brotherhood covets the leadership of all Islam, so does Islamo-Fascism offer itself as a dependable bastion for Germany’s own expansionist aspirations.

    To Germany, willingly and enthusiastically, Egypt opens the gateway to a far-reaching Middle Eastern and African empire. The German dream of becoming a great colonial power in the Middle East and Africa with her own spheres of influence, frustrated by America, Britain, and France for over a century, is becoming a menacing reality! The game is nothing less than a German-run empire stretching through Europe and the Med, with pan-Islam as an ally-empire across the Middle East and Africa.

    And so, hopefully readers of this blog who question our comments on Germany’s links with Islamic terrorism and the 9/11 Hamburg cell, can see the ‘how and why’ of German and Islamic cooperation. This is one of the many reasons why the US and UK spy on Germany in a big way.

    The attacks on 9/11 – planned in Germany, executed mostly by Islamic extremists, was a symbol and outcome of the trust and continued cooperation between Germany and pan-Islamism.

    This trust and understanding between Islam and Germany, is part of the reason Yugoslavia was broken up in cahoots with radical Islam, shortly after Germany gained reunification itself. Destroying the final remnants of post-war treaties and geographical borders.

    http://germanywatch.blogspot.com/2013/07/germany-protector-of-radical-islam.html

  23. David March 4, 2017 at 12:29 am #

    John and company: Congrats on #700, a milestone. In the news segment there were a lot of things that have me very angry and wanting to fight back at these communists and seditionists. How is it that this Valerie Jarrett, and Obama can so blithely and openly conspire to take down the government? Yes, and they ARE CONSPIRING! Why are they not arrested and charged? Please let’s use the website Organizing For Americans to do against them what Organizing For Action is being used for against us. Point me in the right direction John, it’s yours for the asking. Thanks for keeping us informed.

  24. Don March 4, 2017 at 12:28 am #

    natural law , mark passio has an interesting view on morality worth entertaining .Our heart being part of our brain for some of us.

  25. Anna March 4, 2017 at 12:17 am #

    1991 – “The Canopied Earth: World That Was”. By Dennis Gordon Lindsay

  26. Ronald March 3, 2017 at 11:40 pm #

    John, I loved the list of ‘sevens’ associated with God our Father, you gave~ May I add another, which came to me through prayer?

    My favorite verse, spoken by Jesus at the Sermon on the Mount, is Matthew 7:7 “Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:

    “Matthew” is ALSO, 7 letters. Isn’t that awesome?

    • Ronald March 4, 2017 at 12:47 pm #

      I don’t understand why my very first comment here, on a website that I paid to be in, is still “awaiting moderation”,
      a full 15 hours after making it.

    • Mike March 5, 2017 at 3:48 pm #

      They censor any comments they don’t agree with, which means you will probably never see this.

    • randers8 March 7, 2017 at 6:13 pm #

      Nah, I’ve posted some comments I thought for sure would never see the light of day yet they got posted. I do agree it would be nice if comments where posted faster. Once the next show is posted people move on.

  27. mab2014 March 3, 2017 at 9:50 pm #

    John, on the caravan site do we have a general donate site too help fellow caravaners?

    • Brendi March 3, 2017 at 10:30 pm #

      Hello mab2014 – Yes there is a donation button top right on the home page – If you click on the donate button without selecting one of the 3 options, then the donation goes under general on our system. These funds are used to assist fellow Caravaners. Blessings – Brendi

    • Mike March 9, 2017 at 1:54 pm #

      Well they are censoring comments and I’m even playing nice.